The Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Conscious Perception: The Localist Perspective
Open accessAbstract
In recent years the role of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in conscious perception has acquired great interest since it became a pivotal issue distinguishing among prevailing neuronal theories of human consciousness. One can identify three major, and conflicting, views of this role. The globalist view proposes that the PFC is a major hub in a global workspace whose activation is a critical component for any conscious experience. The higher-order thought theory argues that the PFC has a more specialized role underlying higher-order reflection or evaluation, proposed to be an essential element of consciousness. By contrast, the localist view argues that conscious content is linked to localized activations in content-specific cortical areas with no privileged role assigned to the prefrontal cortex in conscious experience in general. According to the localist view, just as posterior cortical areas underlie the conscious experience of visual perceptions, so does the prefrontal cortex underlie the conscious experience of specific categories of conscious contents such as reporting, thinking, speech, and introspection. Here I will review experimental evidence derived from human imaging and recordings, cortical lesions, and direct electrical stimulation in awake patients. Findings from these
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Results from lesion and brain stimulation studies suggest that additional processing in the prefrontal cortex is not necessary for conscious visual perception.
“Evidence against more demanding rival theories includes results from lesion and brain stimulation studies suggesting that additional processing in the prefrontal cortex is not necessary for conscious visual perception.”
From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Malach 2022
This evidence counts against non-local views insofar as they claim that functions in the prefrontal cortex are necessary for consciousness.
“This counts against non-”
From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Malach 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Neuropsychological studies of the frontal lobes.
Stuss, D. T., & Benson, D. F. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.3 · Cited by 1,073 · see citing works
Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness
Lau, H., & Rosenthal, D. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009 · Cited by 869 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Specifically, it has been proposed (Lau & Rosenthal, 2011) , that consciousness is essentially a secondorder, meta-cognitive and introspective process- and hence it depends on cortical areas mediating such second-order functions.”
BackgroundElectrical Cortical Stimulation of the Human Prefrontal Cortex Evokes Complex Visual Hallucinations
Blanke, O., Landis, T., & Seeck, M. (2000) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1006/ebeh.2000.0109 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Andelman-Gur, M. M., Gazit, T., Strauss, I., Fried, I., & Fahoum, F. (2020). Stimulating the inferior fronto- occipital fasciculus elicits complex visual hallucinations. Brain Stimulation, 13(6), 1577-1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.09.003 · DOI
- Anumanchipalli, G. K., Chartier, J., & Chang, E. F. (2019). Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences. Nature, 568(7753), 493-498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1119-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Bassett, D. S., & Sporns, O. (2017). Network neuroscience. Nat Neurosci, 20(3), 353-364. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4502 · DOI · Paper page
- Berkovich-Ohana, A., Noy, N., Harel, M., Furman-Haran, E., Arieli, A., & Malach, R. (2020). Inter- participant consistency of language-processing networks during abstract thoughts. Neuroimage, 211, 116626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116626 · DOI
- Block, N. (2005). Two neural correlates of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Chan, A. W. Y., & Downing, P. E. (2011). Faces and eyes in human lateral prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00051 · DOI
- Corbetta, M., Kincade, M. J., Lewis, C., Snyder, A. Z., & Sapir, A. (2005). Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nat Neurosci, 8(11), 1603-1610. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1574 · DOI · Paper page
- Freiwald, W., Duchaine, B., & Yovel, G. (2016). Face Processing Systems: From Neurons to Real-World Social Perception. Annu Rev Neurosci, 39, 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro- 070815-013934 · DOI
- Gelbard-Sagiv, H., Mukamel, R., Harel, M., Malach, R., & Fried, I. (2008). Internally generated reactivation of single neurons in human hippocampus during free recall. Science, 322(5898), 96- 101. <Go to ISI>://000259680200046
- Glasser, M. F., Coalson, T. S., Robinson, E. C., Hacker, C. D., Harwell, J., Yacoub, E., Ugurbil, K., Andersson, J., Beckmann, C. F., Jenkinson, M., Smith, S. M., & Van Essen, D. C. (2016). A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature, 536(7615), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18933 · DOI · Paper page
- Goldberg, II, Harel, M., & Malach, R. (2006). When the brain loses its self: Prefrontal inactivation during sensorimotor processing. Neuron, 50(2), 329-339. <Go to ISI>://000237176700018
- Golland, Y., Bentin, S., Gelbard, H., Benjamini, Y., Heller, R., Nir, Y., Hasson, U., & Malach, R. (2007). Extrinsic and intrinsic systems in the posterior cortex of the human brain revealed during natural sensory stimulation. Cerebral Cortex, 17(4), 766-777. <Go to ISI>://000244959800003
- Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634-1640. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089506 · DOI · Paper page
- Hesselmann, G., Hebart, M., & Malach, R. (2011). Differential BOLD activity associated with subjective and objective reports during "blindsight" in normal observers. J Neurosci, 31(36), 12936-12944. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1556-11.2011 · DOI
- Malach, R. (2021). Local neuronal relational structures underlying the contents of human conscious experience. Neurosci Conscious, 2021(2), niab028. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niab028 · DOI · Paper page
- Mashour, G. A., Roelfsema, P., Changeux, J. P., & Dehaene, S. (2020). Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis. Neuron, 105(5), 776-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026 · DOI · Paper page
- Moreaud, O. (2003). Balint syndrome. Arch Neurol, 60(9), 1329-1331. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.60.9.1329 · DOI
- Noy, N., Bickel, S., Zion-Golumbic, E., Harel, M., Golan, T., Davidesco, I., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., Goodman, R. R., Schroeder, C. E., Mehta, A. D., & Malach, R. (2015). Ignition's glow: Ultra-fast spread of global cortical activity accompanying local "ignitions" in visual cortex during conscious visual perception. Consciousness and Cognition, 35, 206-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.006 · DOI
- Odegaard, B., Knight, R. T., & Lau, H. (2017). Should a Few Null Findings Falsify Prefrontal Theories of Conscious Perception? Journal of Neuroscience, 37(40), 9593-9602. https://doi.org/10.1523/Jneurosci.3217-16.2017 · DOI · Paper page
- Parvizi, J., Jacques, C., Foster, B. L., Witthoft, N., Rangarajan, V., Weiner, K. S., & Grill-Spector, K. (2012). Electrical stimulation of human fusiform face-selective regions distorts face perception. J Neurosci, 32(43), 14915-14920. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2609-12.2012 · DOI · Paper page
- Pijnenburg, R., Scholtens, L. H., Ardesch, D. J., de Lange, S. C., Wei, Y., & van den Heuvel, M. P. (2021). Myelo-and cytoarchitectonic microstructural and functional human cortical atlases reconstructed in common MRI space. Neuroimage, 239, 118274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118274 · DOI
- Quiroga, R. Q., Kreiman, G., Koch, C., & Fried, I. (2008). Sparse but not 'grandmother-cell' coding in the medial temporal lobe. Trends Cogn Sci, 12(3), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.12.003 · DOI
- Quiroga, R. Q., Mukamel, R., Isham, E. A., Malach, R., & Fried, I. (2008). Human single-neuron responses at the threshold of conscious recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(9), 3599-3604. <Go to ISI>://000253846500075
- Raccah, O., Block, N., & Fox, K. C. R. (2021). Does the Prefrontal Cortex Play an Essential Role in Consciousness? Insights from Intracranial Electrical Stimulation of the Human Brain. J Neurosci, 41(10), 2076-2087. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1141-20.2020 · DOI · Paper page
- Rauschecker, A. M., Dastjerdi, M., Weiner, K. S., Witthoft, N., Chen, J., Selimbeyoglu, A., & Parvizi, J. (2011). Illusions of visual motion elicited by electrical stimulation of human MT complex. Plos One, 6(7), e21798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021798 · DOI
- Sorger, B., Goebel, R., Schiltz, C., & Rossion, B. (2007). Understanding the functional neuroanatomy of acquired prosopagnosia. Neuroimage, 35(2), 836-852. <Go to ISI>://000245293100036
- Tsuchiya, N., Wilke, M., Frassle, S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2015). No-Report Paradigms: Exracting the True Neural Correlates of Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 757-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Zihl, J., von Cramon, D., & Mai, N. (1983). Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. Brain, 106 (Pt 2), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.2.313 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness
Butlin, P., Long, R., Elmoznino, E., Bengio, Y., Birch, J., Constant, A., Deane, G., Fleming, S. M., Frith, C., Ji, X., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08708 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Perceptual stability reflected in neuronal pattern similarities in human visual cortex
Broday-Dvir, R., Norman, Y., Harel, M., Mehta, A. D., & Malach, R. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112614 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Malach, R.
- Affiliations
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Malach, Rafael
- ORCID
- Malach, Rafael
- Venue
- Journal of Consciousness Studies
- Publisher
- Imprint Academic Ltd
- Published
- 2022-07-14
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 93-114
- ISSN
- 1355-8250 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4286239156
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- philarchive.org
- Locations
- Journal of Consciousness Studies (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
- Keywords
- prefrontal cortex, conscious perception, global workspace theory, higher-order thought theory, neural correlates of consciousness, cortical lesions, direct electrical stimulation, self-reflection, reporting, thinking, speech, visual perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review