Cited by 8Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesGenetics and Plant Breeding

Producing a Superior Genotype from Agria Potato Cultivar Using Somaclonal Variation

Open access
Bayati, Eshaghali, Gomarian, Masoud, Mirzaie-Nodousha, Hossein, Changizi, Mehdi, Khaghani, Shahab·2021·Nexo Revista Científica

Abstract

This study was performed to produce a superior genotype from Agria potato cultivar using somaclonal variation. Two leaf and meristem explants in combination with four doses of 2,4-D (0, 2, 3 and 4 mg / l) were used for callus induction in a factorial model based on a completely randomized design with 3 replications. Results showed that the meristem explant, along with 3 mg 2,4-D produced the most suitable calluses. In the mentioned regeneration media, the best calluses were regenerated and one of the regenerated genotypes, which was very different from the parent cultivar was selected. The regenerated genotype, was compared with the maternal genotype (Agria) and a control cultivar (Sante), in a field experiment based on a randomized complete block design with 3 replications. The results showed that in terms of most of the studied traits such as tuber weight per plant, stolon length, percentage of dry matter and percentage of starch, the new genotype was superior, compared to the parent cultivar and in terms of peel percentage and maturity date, the parental cultivar was superior. The results of the molecular comparison also showed that based on CBDP marker, both in terms of band number and band size, there were differences between the new genotype and the parental cultivar. In general, results showed that somaclonal variation can be an effective method to generate new genotypes with superior characteristics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5377/nexo.v34i02.11551

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reducing PGR concentrations can significantly decrease the likelihood of somaclonal variation.

    “Studies have shown that reducing PGR concentrations can significantly decrease the like-lihood of somaclonal variation [68,162], while optimizing environmental conditions such as temperature and light intensity can further stabilize cultures by avoiding stress-induced changes [68].”

    From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Introduction (page not specified) says the hormonal combination of a culture medium can cause genetic changes. The Results and Discussion (page not specified) find significant effects of 2,4-D concentration on callus induction, diameter and weight—not on the likelihood of somaclonal variation. The paper does not establish that lowering PGR concentrations significantly reduces that likelihood. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The induced variation can be screened for desired traits to create new cultivars with desirable quality, known as somaclonal selection.

    “The induced variation can be screened for desired traits to create new cultivars with desirable quality, known as somaclonal selection [68].”
  • Selecting genetically stable genotypes can significantly reduce somaclonal variation.

    “Therefore, selecting genetically stable genotypes-those less prone to genetic changes during tissue culture-can significantly reduce somaclonal variation [68].”

    From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Introduction (page not provided) discusses detecting somaclonal variation and factors associated with genetic changes, such as subcultures and culture-medium hormones. The Methods describe selecting genotypes for desirable growth traits, not for genetic stability. Searches for genetically stable genotypes and their selection found no passage saying that selecting them significantly reduces somaclonal variation. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Optimizing environmental conditions such as temperature and light intensity can further stabilize cultures by avoiding stress-induced changes.

    “while optimizing environmental conditions such as temperature and light intensity can further stabilize cultures by avoiding stress-induced changes [68].”

    From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

    Materials and Methods reports a light–dark schedule and growth-chamber temperatures, but does not test whether adjusting them stabilizes cultures. The Introduction links genetic changes to subcultures and culture-medium hormones; searches for light intensity, temperature optimization, and stress-induced changes found no passage connecting those conditions to culture stability. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bolandi, A., Hamidi, H., Kefayi, S., 2010. The effect of plant distance and gland weight on the performance of Santa potato, Second National Conference on Agriculture and Sustainable Development (Opportunities and Challenges Ahead), Shiraz, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch, Iran.
  2. Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L., 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19:11-15.
  3. Ehsanpour, A.A., Madani, Sh. and Valian Brujeni, S., 2007. Detection of somaclonal variation in potato callus induced by uv-c radiation using RAPD-PCR Gen. Journal of Science, 3: 495-506.
  4. Mamnouie, A., Karaminejad, M.R., Rashed Mohassel, M.R., and Shimi, P., 2016. Evaluation of some herbicides in controlling potato weeds (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Jiroft and Karaj, Quarterly Plant Protection, 30 (3).
  5. Rabiee, Z. Rashedi, H., Tahmasebi-Enferadi, S. and Akbari, A.A., 2011. Using Real time-PCR method to identify genetically engineered potato resistant to PVY virus compared to non-potato Transgenic, Journal of Food Science and Technology, 8:28.
  6. Rashidi, M., Rousta, H.R., Karimi, H.R., Alaei, H. and Tadayon-Nejad, M., 2013. Comparison of vegetative growth and minituber yield in three potato cultivars in aerospace and hydroponic systems classic (bed) and three different food solutions. Journal of Greenhouse Crops Science and Technology: 4(14): 73-80.
  7. Rostami, R., Abarshamchi, P. and Lahouti, M., 2012. Callus induction and plant regeneration from potato meristem cultivation. Journal of Science of Tarbiat Moallem University, 10: 1011-1032
  8. Shahpiri, A., Omidi, M., Ahmadian Tehrani, P. and Davoodi, D., 2004, Study of tissue culture and variety of sumaclon in potatoes, Journal of Agricultural Science, 2: 323-335.
  9. Shirin, F., Hossain, M., Kabir, M.F., Roy, M. and Sarker, S.R., 2007. Callus induction and plant regeneration from internodal and leaf explant of four Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars. World Journal of Agricultural Science. 3: 1-6.
  10. Shoushtari, L., Atminan, A., Mehrafarin, A. and Ghaderi, A., 2014. Genetic and phytochemical evaluation of samples obtained from tissue culture of fennel (Foeniculum vulgar) in different hormonal concentrations. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 4:52.
  11. Siadat, S.A., Hashemi Dezfuli, S., Sadeghzadeh Hamayati, S., Valizadeh, M., Noor Mohammadi, Q. and Fathi, Q., 2000. The effect of planting pattern and plant density on yield and some characteristics Endocrinology of the potato, three cultivars of potatoes in Ardabil region, Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16 (12): 91-111.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayati, E., Gomarian, M., Mirzaie-Nodousha, H., Changizi, M., & Khaghani, S.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University, Arak (IR)
  • Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands (IR)
Venue
Nexo Revista Científica
Published
2021-06-07
Volume
34
Issue
02
Pages
671-681
ISSN
  • 1818-6742 (ISSN-L)
  • 1995-9516
OpenAlex
W3169493015
Cited by
8
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Nexo Revista Científica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
Keywords
somaclonal variation, potato breeding, callus induction, 2,4-D concentration, meristem explants, leaf explants, plant regeneration, tuber weight, starch content, maturity date

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review