Cited by 2Educational Philosophies and PedagogiesAdult and Continuing Education TopicsEducation for Peace and Conflict Resolution

Teaching further education students the effects of naive realism, to support social development and mitigate classroom conflict

Smith, Sam·2020·Educational and Child Psychology

Abstract

Aim(s) Naive realism is the false conviction that one perceives and responds to the world objectively or ‘as it is’ rather than subjectively through the lens of personal motives, experiences and expectations. The teaching of naïve realism to adults has evidenced increased perspective taking. The current research aimed to evaluate if this approach would be effective in supporting adolescents experiencing classroom conflict. Method A critical realist approach was employed. Participants were a class of fifteen 16–19-year-old further education (FE) students and related academic staff. Students attended two one-hour lessons on naïve realism. Thematic analysis was conducted on pre- and post-teaching focus group data. Findings Pre-intervention, students identified feeling that others were acting belligerently and presenting inaccurate narratives, yet defended their own similar behaviour as routine. Unexpectedly, students also reported a conscious and purposeful use of naïve realism. Post-intervention, students and staff reported: substantial conflict resolution; improved abilities to perspective take, empathise and self-regulate; reduced fear of negative peer evaluation and anxiety; improved learning atmosphere and applications to the wider world. Novel findings include: the benefits of teaching as a whole-class approach; and how bias removal was insufficient to facilitate perspective taking in certain circumstances. Limitations The subjective and interpretative nature of the resear…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53841/bpsecp.2020.37.3.56

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Educating students about naïve realism helps them take others' perspectives and deal with conflict.

    “In addition to employing a refutational approach, there is some evidence that educating students about naïve realism, specifically, helps them to keep a more open mind (Nasie et al., 2014) and helps them take others' perspectives and deal with conflict (Smith, 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Smith, S.
Corresponding author
Smith, Sam
Venue
Educational and Child Psychology
Published
2020-09
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
56-68
ISSN
  • 0267-1611 (ISSN-L)
  • 2396-8702
OpenAlex
W3126978590
Cited by
2
References
4
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational and Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education for Peace and Conflict Resolution
Keywords
naive realism, perspective taking, classroom conflict, further education students, adolescents, conflict resolution, empathy, self-regulation, bias awareness, social development (developmental psychology), peer relationships, coming of age, well-being, whole-class instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review