Cited by 22Cancer survivorship and careOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingWomen's cancer prevention and management

The factors influencing quality of life in women with breast cancer

Open access
Ryu, Young Mi, Yi, Myungsun·2013·Asian Oncology Nursing

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify the influence of hope, resilience, and spousal support on quality of life in women with breast cancer. Methods: A predictive correlational design was used. The data were collected by questionnaires from a convenience sample of 163 women with breast cancer in 2012. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson’s Correlation Coefficients, and stepwise multiple regression. Results: Mean age of the participants was 51.5±6.39 and 46.0% reported to have stage II at diagnosis and 40.5% were more than 5 years since diagnosis. The quality of life was different by age and type of surgery. Hope, resilience, spousal support, and quality of life were significantly correlated each other (r=.35-.64, p<.01). Quality of life accounted for 23.4% of the variance by resilience, spousal support, and type of surgery. The most important factor was resilience, which explained 18.9% of the variation. Conclusion: The results of the study show the importance of resilience in explaining the quality of life in Korean women with breast cancer. Thus, oncology nurses should focus on resilience to develop and implement more effective interventions to improve patients’ quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5388/aon.2013.13.3.121

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Korean Breast Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures. [Accessed March 1, 2013]. http://www.kbcs.or.kr/journal/file/2010_2012_Breast_Cancer_Facts_and_Figures_updated.pdf.
  2. Lee IS. In: Uncertainty, appraisal and quality of life in patients with breast cancer across treatment phases [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei Univ.; 2005.
  3. Paek KW. In: The relationship between spouse and quality of life in patients with mastectomy [dissertation]. Jinju: Gyeong-sang National Univ.; 2004.
  4. Choi SS. In: A correlational study on spiritual wellness, hope and perceived health status of urban adults [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei Univ.; 1990.
  5. Nam KS. In: A study on the correlation between spouse support and the body image of female patients who have done mastection and hysterectomy [dissertation]. Seoul: Ewha Womans Univ.; 1988.
  6. Park EY. Changes of quality of life during the period of treatments in patients with high risk breast cancer. J Korean Oncol Nurs 2001;1:32–43.

Authors
Ryu, Y. M., & Yi, M.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Venue
Asian Oncology Nursing
Publisher
XMLink
Published
2013
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
121
ISSN
  • 1598-4559 (ISSN-L)
  • 2287-2434
  • 2287-447X
OpenAlex
W1954200197
Cited by
22
References
25
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
ko
Open access
Locations
Asian Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
breast cancer, quality of life, hope, resilience, spousal support, women, type of surgery, Korean women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review