CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 290Artificial Intelligence in EducationAI in Service InteractionsArtificial Intelligence Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Holy or Unholy? Interview with Open AI’s ChatGPT

Open access
Iskender, Ali·2023·European Journal of Tourism Research
DOI 10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this paper, OpenAI's ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), also known as GPT-3, a machine-learning model that has the ability to generate human-like text, was employed as an interviewee instead of a human subject. The scope of the interview was the impacts of OpenAI's GPT on higher education and academic publishing. Particularly, several questions about the impacts of OpenAI's ChatGPT and other AI-based machine learning models on the hospitality and tourism industry and education were asked. The originality of this paper derives from having the ChatGPT as an interviewee. ChatGPT stated that its use helps instructors delegate monotonous tasks such as grading and focus on more intellectual tasks, and students may utilize ChatGPT to brainstorm ideas. ChatGPT confesses the risk of diminishing critical thinking for students in the case of over-reliance on ChatGPT as well as educational inequalities. For academic work, ChatGPT addressed it cannot be a substitute for human creativity and intellectuality because originality and novelty lack in outputs generated by ChatGPT. The tourism and hospitality industry can benefit from ChatGPT for certain things such as personalized services, content creation, and many more.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cairns-Lee, H., Lawley, J., & Tosey, P. (2022). Enhancing researcher reflexivity about the influence of leading questions in interviews. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 58(1), 164-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886321103744 · DOI
  2. Kasparov, G. (2010). The chess master and the computer. The New York Review of Books, 57(2), 16-19.
  3. Stokel-Walker, C. (2022, December 9). AI Bot ChatGPT writes Smart Essays -should professors worry? Nature News. Retrieved January 24, 2023, from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022- 04397-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–290 of 290

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Iskender, A.
Venue
European Journal of Tourism Research
Publisher
Varna University of Management
Published
2023-03-14
Volume
34
Pages
3414
ISSN
  • 1314-0817 (ISSN-L)
  • 1994-7658
DOI
10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169
OpenAlex
W4327624031
Cited by
260
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 56
FWCI
61.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • European Journal of Tourism Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
ChatGPT, GPT-3, large language models, artificial intelligence in higher education, scholarly publishing, automated grading, critical thinking, educational inequality, personalized services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review