The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Desirable Difficulties in Vocabulary Learning
Open accessAbstract
In this article we discuss the role of desirable difficulties in vocabulary learning from two perspectives, one having to do with identifying conditions of learning that impose initial challenges to the learner but then benefit later retention and transfer, and the other having to do with the role of certain difficulties that are intrinsic to language processes, are engaged during word learning, and reflect how language is understood and produced. from each perspective we discuss evidence that supports the notion that difficulties in learning and imposed costs to language processing may produce benefits because they are likely to increase conceptual understanding. We then consider the consequences of these processes for actual second- language learning and suggest that some of the domain- general cognitive advantages that have been reported for proficient bilinguals may reflect difficulties imposed by the learning process, and by the requirement to negotiate cross- language competition, that are broadly desirable. as alice Healy and her collaborators were perhaps the first to demonstrate, research on desirable difficulties in vocabulary and language learning holds the promise of bringing together research traditions on memory and language that have much to offer each other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x · Cited by 2,867
Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system
GREEN, D. W. (1998) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728998000133 · Cited by 2,807
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 · Cited by 2,656 · cited 8×
“Like Kroll and Stewart (1994), Schneider et al. (2002) also included a manipulation of semantic blocking to determine whether contextual interference might produce a desirable difficulty in learning.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationThe power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x · Cited by 2,037
The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152408 · Cited by 1,791 · cited 1×
“Karpicke and Roediger (2008) also found a sizeable long- term advantage of testing over restudying Swahili– English pairs, but in an interesting and unusual way.”
BackgroundSelf-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 · Cited by 1,468
Self-citationUnsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.
Kornell, N., Hays, M. J., & Bjork, R. A. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0015729 · Cited by 484
Self-citationSchweizer, T. A., Ware, J., Fischer, C. E., Craik, F. I. M., & Bialystok, E. (2012) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.009 · Cited by 363
When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
Grimaldi, P. J., & Karpicke, J. D. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0 · Cited by 200
The benefit of generating errors during learning
Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033194 · Cited by 166 · cited 14×
“However, an interesting and provocative series of experiments by Potts and Shanks (2014) suggests that error generation might indeed facilitate such vocabulary learning. In two experiments, Potts and Shanks (2014) had English- speaking participants learn words they did not know. In one experiment the words were Englis…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
The Developing Infant Creates a Curriculum for Statistical Learning
Smith, L. B., Jayaraman, S., Clerkin, E., & Yu, C. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.004 · Cited by 299
Benefits of guided self-management of attention on learning accounting.
Sithole, S. T. M., Chandler, P., Abeysekera, I., & Paas, F. (2017) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000127 · Cited by 42
Lima, M. F. R. D., & Buratto, L. G. (2021) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020988524 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- BJorK, R. A., & Kroll, J. F.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 2015-07-01
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-252
- ISSN
- 0002-9556 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8298
- OpenAlex
- W2316805075
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 18.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Desirable Difficulties in Vocabulary Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0241
- The paper
- BJorK, R. A., & Kroll, J. F. (2015). Desirable Difficulties in Vocabulary Learning. The American Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.