Cited by 199Musicology and Musical AnalysisDiverse Musicological StudiesMusic History and Culture

The social life of musical instruments

Open access
Bates, Eliot·2012·Ethnomusicology

Abstract

While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.If you believe that this is the case for this document, please contact UBIRA@lists.bham.ac.uk providing details and we will remove

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5406/ethnomusicology.56.3.0363

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Musical instruments are not separate from the expressive and social use that is made of them.

    “And yet, it should not be ignored by designers and programmers that musical instruments are not separate from the expressive and social use that is made of them (Bates, 2012), and that therefore the two areas should grow in relation to each other.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. Th e Social Life of Th ings: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. ---. 1977. "Movements in Playing the Herati Dutār. " In Anthropology of the Body, edited by John Blacking, 275-330. London: Academic Press.
  3. Berliner, Paul. 1993. Th e Soul of the Mbira: Music and Traditions of the People of Zimbabwe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Çolakoğlu, Gözde. 2008. "Anadolu' dan Balkanlara Armudi Biçimindeki Kemençeler: Tarih, Teknik ve Geleneksel İcrasına İlişkin Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz" (Pear-shaped kemençes from Anato- lia to the Balkans: a comparative analysis of history, technique, and traditional performance connections). Ph.D. Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University.
  5. DeVale, Sue Carole. 1988. "Musical Instruments and Ritual: A Systematic Approach. " Journal of the American Musical Instrument Society 5:89-123.
  6. Falkner, J. Meade. 1895. Th e Lost Stradivarius. New York: Penguin. Available at www.gutenberg.org/ ebooks/14107 (accessed April 2012).
  7. Hood, Mantle. 1982. Th e Ethnomusicologist. Revised edition. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
  8. Hornbostel, Erich M. von, and Curt Sachs. 1961. "Classifi cation of Musical Instruments. " Translated by A. Baines and K. Wachsmann. Th e Galpin Society Journal 14:3-29.
  9. Latour, Bruno. 1996. "On Actor-Network Th eory: A Few Clarifi cations. " Soziale Welt 47(4):369-81.
  10. ---. 1986b. "Th e Role of Expressive Culture in the Demystifi cation of a Secret Sect of Islam: Th e Case of the Alevis of Turkey. " Th e World of Music 28(3):42-56.
  11. Melville, Herman. [1852] 1992. Pierre; Or, Th e Ambiguities. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  12. Soydaş, Emin. 2007. "Osmanlı Sarayında Çalgılar" (Instruments in the Ottoman Court). Ph.D. Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University.
  13. Stokes, Martin. 1992. "Th e Media and Reform: Th e Saz and Elektrosaz in Urban Turkish Folk Music. " British Journal of Ethnomusicology 1:89-103.
  14. White, Kelly, and Arnold Myers. 2004. "Woodwind Instruments of Boosey & Company. " Galpin Society Journal 57:62-80.

Authors
Bates, E.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Bates, Eliot
Venue
Ethnomusicology
Published
2012-09-01
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
363-395
ISSN
  • 0014-1836 (ISSN-L)
  • 2156-7417
OpenAlex
W2133700293
Cited by
199
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
119.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ethnomusicology (publishedVersion)
  • CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • American Research Institute in Turkey
  • Society for the Humanities, Cornell University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Musicological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
Keywords
musical instruments, material culture, music and society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review