Cited by 23Sodium Intake and HealthBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesPotassium and Related Disorders

Potassium treatment for hypertension in patients with high salt intake: A meta-analysis

Bommel, Eric van, Cleophas, Ton·2012·Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous metaanalyses of potassium supplementation in patients with hypertension observed little or no benefit, but failed to account the amount of salt intake. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect on blood pressure of potassium treatment in patients with high salt intake. METHODS: We meta-analyzed studies of patient populations with both high salt and potassium intake. We searched Medline, Google, major journals, Pubmed. Publication bias, lack of heterogeneity, and lack of robustness were assessed using standard procedures for such purposes. RESULTS: After the exclusion of 32 studies 10 studies were left in the meta-analysis. A pooled reduction of systolic blood pressure of -9.5 mmHg (95% confidence interval -10.8 to -8.1) and of diastolic blood pressure -6.4 mmHg (-7.3 to -5.6) was observed. These results were very heterogeneous (I2-values of 94 and 95%). After exclusion of single authored studies the results fell but remained statistically significant, -7.1 mmHg (-8.5 to -5.7), and -4.9 mmHg (-5.8 to -4.0). Heterogeneity of systolic blood pressure was no longer observed (I2-value 24.3%). Some publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Potassium treatment reduces the blood pressure substantially in hypertensive patients with salt-rich diets. 2. The difference in magnitude of blood pressure reduction between different studies is probably related to the amount of salt intake. 3. Patients with reduced salt intake benefit little from potassium treatment. 4. Major meta-analyses published to date have severely underestimated the potential benefit of potassium treatment in patients with hypertension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5414/cp201724

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent meta-analysis reported higher mortality with sodium reduction in trials of heart failure patients.

    “A recent meta-analysis reported higher mortality with sodium reduction in trials of heart failure patients.35”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bommel, E. V., & Cleophas, T.
Affiliations
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis (NL)
Venue
Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Published
2012-07-01
Volume
50
Issue
07
Pages
478-482
ISSN
0946-1965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976403071
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Potassium and Related Disorders
Keywords
potassium supplementation, hypertension, high-salt diet, blood pressure reduction, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, publication bias
MeSH terms
Diastole, Humans, Hypertension, Systole, Potassium, Dietary, Sodium Chloride, Dietary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review