Cited by 5Innovations in Medical EducationHealth Education and ValidationHealth Sciences Research and Education

Importance of incorporating measures of attitude in planning and evaluating nursing education

Open access
Daly, Barbara J., Nock, Nora, Margevicius, Seunghee, Meropol, Neal J.·2018·Journal of Nursing Education and Practice

Abstract

Learners' attitudes towards a topic or behavior has long been recognized as an important component in the evaluation of formal education as well as in achieving desired behavior change. However, attitudes are frequently neglected and evaluation of outcomes from continuing nursing education often includes only changes in knowledge and learner satisfaction. We describe measurement of attitudes of oncology nurses towards holding discussions with patients about the option of participating in a clinical trial, in comparison to what can be learned from measuring knowledge alone. This article illustrates important insights that can be gained through inclusion of measures of attitude in both designing and evaluating continuing education using data from a larger on-going study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5430/jnep.v9n4p1

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incorporating attitudinal factors into the design and evaluation of program outcomes is particularly relevant for behaviors influenced by a strong foundation of knowledge and favorable attitudes toward those behaviors.

    “Incorporating attitudinal factors into the design and evaluation of program outcomes is particularly relevant for behaviors influenced by a strong foundation of knowledge and favorable attitudes toward those behaviors (Daly et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Daly, B. J., Nock, N., Margevicius, S., & Meropol, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Flatiron Health (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Nursing Education and Practice
Published
2018-11-26
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
1
ISSN
  • 1925-4040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1925-4059
OpenAlex
W2902984524
Cited by
5
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Education and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R25CA177574)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
nursing attitudes, continuing nursing education, oncology nurses, clinical trial participation, attitude measurement, education evaluation, behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review