Importance of incorporating measures of attitude in planning and evaluating nursing education
Open accessAbstract
Learners' attitudes towards a topic or behavior has long been recognized as an important component in the evaluation of formal education as well as in achieving desired behavior change. However, attitudes are frequently neglected and evaluation of outcomes from continuing nursing education often includes only changes in knowledge and learner satisfaction. We describe measurement of attitudes of oncology nurses towards holding discussions with patients about the option of participating in a clinical trial, in comparison to what can be learned from measuring knowledge alone. This article illustrates important insights that can be gained through inclusion of measures of attitude in both designing and evaluating continuing education using data from a larger on-going study.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Incorporating attitudinal factors into the design and evaluation of program outcomes is particularly relevant for behaviors influenced by a strong foundation of knowledge and favorable attitudes toward those behaviors.
“Incorporating attitudinal factors into the design and evaluation of program outcomes is particularly relevant for behaviors influenced by a strong foundation of knowledge and favorable attitudes toward those behaviors (Daly et al., 2019).”
From Outcome domains and assessment measures in school-based youth mentoring programs: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Daly et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Health Belief Model: a decade later.
Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818401100101 · Cited by 8,437 · see citing works
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[4, 5] The importance of attitudes as a determinant of learning and subsequent behavior is well established and reflected in widely tested theories of behavior change, such as Ajzen & Fishbein’s Theory of Planned Behavior[6] and the Health ∗Correspondence: Barbara J. Daly; Email: barbara.daly@case.edu; Address: School…”
BackgroundTaxonomy of educational objectives
(2014) · Encyclopedia of Educational Theory and Philosophy · doi:10.4135/9781483346229.n326 · Cited by 2,480 · see citing works
Reducing and meta-analysing estimates from distributed lag non-linear models
Gasparrini, A., & Armstrong, B. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-1 · Cited by 1,081 · see citing works
Mills, E. J., Seely, D., Rachlis, B., Griffith, L. E., Wu, P., Wilson, K. R., Ellis, P., & Wright, J. R. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70576-9 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Effectiveness of continuing education programmes in nursing: literature review
Griscti, O., & Jacono, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03940.x · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Wright, J. R., Whelan, T. J., Schiff, S., Dubois, S. J., Crooks, D. L., Haines, P. T., DeRosa, D., Roberts, R. S., Gafni, A., Pritchard, K. I., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.01.187 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Davis, D. (2006) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.46 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Randomized Trial of a Web-Based Intervention to Address Barriers to Clinical Trials
Meropol, N. J., Wong, Y., Albrecht, T. L., Manne, S. L., Miller, S. M., Flamm, A. L., Benson, A. B., Buzaglo, J. S., Collins, M., Egleston, B. L., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.2257 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationCazzell, M. A., & Rodríguez, A. G. (2011) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20111017-04 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Clinical Trials and the Role of the Oncology Clinical Trials Nurse
Ness, E. A., & Royce, C. (2017) · Nursing Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.cnur.2016.10.005 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Getz, K. A. (2017) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.09.014 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Evaluating Continuing Nursing Education
Gosnell, D. J. (1984) · The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing · doi:10.3928/0022-0124-19840101-04 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
The Role of Oncology Nurses in Discussing Clinical Trials
Flocke, S. A., Antognoli, E., Daly, B. J., et al. (2017) · Oncology nursing forum · doi:10.1188/17.onf.547-552 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationGaguski, M. E., Kim, G., Bruce, S. D., et al. (2017) · Clinical journal of oncology nursing · doi:10.1188/17.cjon.679-687 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Evaluation of the National Cancer Institute's clinical trials booklet.
Sw, D., Eo, N., & Jc, S. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-efficacy as Predictors of Preparedness for Oncology Clinical Trials
Manne, S. L., Kashy, D. A., Albrecht, T. L., et al. (2013) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x13511704 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
VanHoff, D., Hesser, T., Kelly, K. P., et al. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-154 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Knowledge and skills of cancer clinical trials nurses in Australia
Scott, K., White, K., Johnson, C., et al. (2011) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05816.x · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Nurse-Led Programs to Facilitate Enrollment to Children’s Oncology Group Cancer Control Trials
Haugen, M., Kelly, K. P., Leonard, M., et al. (2015) · Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1177/1043454215617458 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tiraieyari, N., & Krauss, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1518053
- Authors
- Daly, B. J., Nock, N., Margevicius, S., & Meropol, N. J.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Flatiron Health (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Education and Practice
- Published
- 2018-11-26
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1925-4040 (ISSN-L)
- 1925-4059
- PMC
- PMC7453751
- OpenAlex
- W2902984524
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Education and Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R25CA177574)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- nursing attitudes, continuing nursing education, oncology nurses, clinical trial participation, attitude measurement, education evaluation, behavior change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review