Cited by 19Artificial Intelligence in EducationEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

Impact of Artificial Intelligence Versus Traditional Instruction for Language Learning: A Survey

Open access
Dhanapal, Chitra, Asharudeen, N., Alfaruque, Sabina Yasmin·2024·World Journal of English Language

Abstract

This study examined the impact of AI-based training compared to conventional instruction approaches in the context of language acquisition.Employing a survey-based methodology, this study collected data from language learners to assess their perspectives and experiences of both traditional and AI-based training.The aim was to determine the advantages and disadvantages of AI-based training and its potential to enhance language learning outcomes.This study commences with a comprehensive analysis of existing research on AI in language learning and compares AI-based training with conventional instruction techniques.This study seeks to contribute to the existing body of knowledge by identifying the gaps in the literature.A representative sample of 72 learners will be administered the survey questionnaire as part of the research approach.The study collected demographic data from respondents and information on their experiences with and opinions on both traditional and AI-based training.Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the responses and draw insightful conclusions.The findings of this study shed light on the impact of AI-based training on language-learning outcomes.The analysis compared the effectiveness of AI-based instruction with conventional teaching methods, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.The study also addresses the constraints and challenges encountered during the research process, which could affect the generalizability of the results.The study’s findings have implications for language teachers, educational institutions, and policymakers while also advancing our understanding of AI’s role of AI in language learning.The results may guide decisions regarding instructional strategies, curriculum design, and the use of AI technology in language learning programs.The study concludes with recommendations for further investigation of the potential of AI-based language learning training and solutions to the issues identified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5430/wjel.v14n2p182

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ali, A., Al-Tamimi, S., & Abdallah, A. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on English language learners' and teachers' motivation. International Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 191-210.
  2. eam7n · DOI
  3. Yan, Y. (2023). The role of AI-assisted language learning tools in developing EFL students' writing performance. Journal of Educational Technology & Development, 22(1), 1-12.

Authors
Dhanapal, C., Asharudeen, N., & Alfaruque, S. Y.
Affiliations
King Khalid University (SA)
Venue
World Journal of English Language
Publisher
Sciedu Press
Published
2024-01-12
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
182
ISSN
  • 1925-0703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1925-0711
OpenAlex
W4390816389
Cited by
19
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Journal of English Language (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
King Khalid University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
AI-assisted language learning, traditional teaching methods, language acquisition, learner perceptions, language learning outcomes, teaching effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review