The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bone-Graft Harvesting From Iliac and Fibular Donor Sites: Techniques and Complications
Abstract
The ilium and the fibula are the most common sites for bone-graft harvesting. The different methods for harvesting iliac bone graft include curettage, trapdoor or splitting techniques for cancellous bone, and the subcrestal-window technique for bicortical graft. A tricortical graft from the anterior ilium should be taken at least 3 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). Iliac donor-site complications include pain, neurovascular injury, avulsion fractures of the ASIS, hematoma, infection, herniation of abdominal contents, gait disturbance, cosmetic deformity, violation of the sacroiliac joint, and ureteral injury. The neurovascular structures at risk for injury during iliac bone-graft harvesting include the lateral femoral cutaneous, iliohypogastric, and ilioinguinal nerves anteriorly and the superior cluneal nerves and superior gluteal neurovascular bundle posteriorly. Violation of the sacroiliac joint can be avoided by limiting the harvested area to 4 cm from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and by not penetrating the inner cortex. The caudal limit for bone harvesting should be the inferior margin of the roughened area anterior to the PSIS on the outer table to keep from injuring the superior gluteal artery. Potential complications of fibular graft harvesting include neurovascular injury, compartment syndrome, extensor hallucis longus weakness, and ankle instability. The neurovascular structures at risk for injury during fibular bone-graft harvesting include the peroneal nerves and their muscular branches in the proximal third of the fibular shaft and the peroneal vessels in the middle third.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bone Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and Challenges
Amini, A. R., Laurencin, C. T., & Nukavarapu, S. P. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v40.i5.10 · Cited by 2,336
Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial?
Haugen, H. J., Lyngstadaas, S. P., Rossi, F., & Perale, G. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.13058 · Cited by 573
Porzionato, A., Stocco, E., Barbon, S., Grandi, F., Macchi, V., & De Caro, R. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19124117 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Ebraheim, N. A., Elgafy, H., & Xu, R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 210-218
- ISSN
- 1067-151X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1790935257
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone-Graft Harvesting From Iliac and Fibular Donor Sites: Techniques and Complications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5435/00124635-200105000-00007
- The paper
- Ebraheim, N. A., Elgafy, H., & Xu, R. (2001). Bone-Graft Harvesting From Iliac and Fibular Donor Sites: Techniques and Complications. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200105000-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.