The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: PERSONAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS AT WORK.
Abstract
This study examined the independent and joint contributions of employees' creativity-relevant personal characteristics and three characteristics of the organizational context—job complexity, suppor...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most research in organizational behavior either measured creativity as one holistic factor (e.g., Oldham & Cummings, 1996; Shalley, 1991), or focused mainly on the novelty aspect of creativity (Eisenberger, Haskins, & Gamblton, 1999; Goncalo & Staw, 2006; Madjar & Oldham, 2006; Zhou & Shalley, 2003).”
From Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts (2010) · cites this paper as Oldham & Cummings, 1996
In the citing paper
“Whereas creativity has been conceived of as the generation of novel and useful ideas, innovation has generally been argued to be both the production of creative ideas as the first stage, and their implementation as the second stage (Amabile, 1996; Oldham & Cummings, 1996; Shalley & Zhou, 2008; West & Farr, 1990).”
From Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework (2014) · cites this paper as Oldham & Cummings, 1996
In the citing paper
“Whereas creativity has been conceived of as the generation of novel and useful ideas, innovation has generally been argued to be both the production of creative ideas as the first stage, and their implementation as the second stage (Amabile, 1996; Oldham & Cummings, 1996; Shalley & Zhou, 2008; West & Farr, 1990).”
From Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework (2014) · cites this paper as Oldham & Cummings, 1996
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 82 · Cited by 3,749
Metadata
- Authors
- Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1996-06-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 607-634
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2155547762
- Cited by
- 3,749
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 93 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 136 · 2023: 201 · 2022: 242 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 203 · 2019: 206 · 2018: 219 · 2017: 185 · 2016: 201 · 2015: 247 · 2014: 202 · 2013: 217 · 2012: 203
- FWCI
- 21.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- employee creativity, personal characteristics, organizational context, job complexity, organizational support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: PERSONAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS AT WORK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256657
- The paper
- Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: PERSONAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS AT WORK. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657
