Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 467

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO TECHNOLOGICAL THREATS.

Cooper, Arnold, Demuzzio, Edward, Hatten, Kenneth, Hicks, Elijah, Tock, Donald·1973·Academy of Management Proceedings

Abstract

The article reports on technological innovations that have the capability of transforming industries. The author focuses on examining the aforementioned technology from the viewpoints of professionals working in the industries that the innovations are capable of transforming. The results of a study examining the effects technological innovations have had on industries including the steam locomotive industry, the fountain pen industry, and the safety razor industry are examined. In each of these cases, existing technology was forced to compete with newer technology. Sales statistics from each industry are examined to determine the effect of innovation adoption.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/ambpp.1973.4981186

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 467

Metadata

Authors
Cooper, A., Demuzzio, E., Hatten, K., Hicks, E., & Tock, D.
Venue
Academy of Management Proceedings
Published
1973-08
Volume
1973
Issue
1
Pages
54-59
ISSN
  • 0065-0668 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-6561
OpenAlex
W2169655220
Cited by
467
References
0
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO TECHNOLOGICAL THREATS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/ambpp.1973.4981186
The paper
Cooper, A., Demuzzio, E., Hatten, K., Hicks, E., & Tock, D. (1973). STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO TECHNOLOGICAL THREATS. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1973.4981186

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.