Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Innovation and Knowledge ManagementTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourOrganizational Management and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ADOPTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATIONS: INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL DETERMINANTS.

Tabak, Filiz, Barr, Steve H.·1996·Academy of Management Proceedings
DOI 10.5465/ambpp.1996.4980980
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigates how individual and organizational contexts affect strategic decision makers' interpretation and adoption of potential organizational innovations. Results indicate positive significant relationships between functional interpretations and risk propensity, self-efficacy, past experience, organizational strategy and resource availability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/ambpp.1996.4980980

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tabak, F., & Barr, S. H.
ORCID
Tabak, Filiz
Venue
Academy of Management Proceedings
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
1996-08
Volume
1996
Issue
1
Pages
388-392
ISSN
  • 0065-0668 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-6561
DOI
10.5465/ambpp.1996.4980980
OpenAlex
W2321613551
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
Keywords
strategic decision-making, risk propensity, self-efficacy, prior experience, organizational strategy, resource availability, functional interpretation, individual determinants, organizational factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.