The DOI matches its Crossref record.
"Trust, Social Capital Development Behaviors, Feedback Seeking and Emotional Exhaustion During Entry"
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between newcomers’ trust in the supervisor and social capital development behaviors, using feedback seeking from the supervisor as a mediator and emotional exhaustion as a moderator. Based on a three-wave time-lagged study (N = 224) among newcomers, we found trust in the supervisor to be indirectly and positively related to social capital development behaviors through the mediating influence of feedback seeking from the supervisor. In addition, feedback seeking interacted with emotional exhaustion in predicting social capital development behaviors such that it was more positively related to these behaviors at high levels of emotional exhaustion. The indirect relationship of trust to social capital development behaviors as mediated by feedback seeking was also stronger at high levels of emotional exhaustion. We discuss this study’s implications under the lenses of Expectancy-Value models of self-regulation and Conservation of Resources theory.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SL-7 has already been validated and tested by scholars across various organizations.
“Even though SL-7 has already been validated and tested by scholars across various organizations (Karatepe et al., 2018;Lapointe & Vandenberghe, 2015;Tang et al., 2016)”
From Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study (2022) · cites this paper as Lapointe & Vandenberghe, 2015
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study
Canavesi, A., & Minelli, E. (2022) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/s10672-021-09389-9 · Cited by 95
“Even though SL-7 has already been validated and tested by scholars across various organizations (Karatepe et al., 2018; Lapointe & Vandenberghe, 2015; Tang et al., 2016), to the authors’ knowledge, it has not yet been applied to the Italian cultural, economic and political context.”
BackgroundXu, Z., Yu, G., Wang, H., & Liu, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1421412 · Cited by 10
Huang, Y., Lee, Y. H., Chang, G., Ma, J., & Wang, G. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.605784 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Lapointe, É., & Vandenberghe, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- HEC Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Proceedings
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 2015
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11494
- ISSN
- 0065-0668 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-6561
- OpenAlex
- W2524292268
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- trust in supervisor, social capital development, feedback seeking, emotional exhaustion, newcomers, organizational entry, supervisor-employee relationship, self-regulation, conservation of resources theory, expectancy-value theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
