Cited by 63Innovation and Knowledge ManagementResearch, Science, and AcademiaOrganizational Management and Leadership

Organizational designs for R&D

DeSanctis, Gerardine, Glass, Jeffrey T., Ensing, Ingrid Morris·2002·Academy of Management Perspectives

Abstract

Executive OverviewResearch and development is becoming increasingly business-oriented, and corporate reliance on new technology and innovation is greater than ever. How can R&D activities be organized to yield the greatest value for the enterprise? A study of 14 leading technology-intensive companies in six industries illustrates how three organizational designs are being used to manage distributed, flexible R&D organizations: (1) decentralized, (2) networked, and (3) integrated. Decentralized designs limit the role of a central R&D group; they direct R&D resources more toward products and markets rather than basic scientific activities. Networked designs push the boundaries of R&D outside the confines of a central R&D group and the firm as a whole. Integrated models use sophisticated communication linkages to tie centralized, science-based activities with the business needs of the corporation. Within the three design approaches, there are design variants, each with its positive and negative tradeoffs. We show how some designs for R&D are more effective than others and provide suggestions for how companies in search of an ideal organization design for R&D can select among possible configurations to promote adaptive, value-oriented R&D organizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/ame.2002.8540314

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Learning from collaboration is a function of a firm's access to knowledge and its possession of the capabilities for utilising the relationships and knowledge established.

    “Learning from collaboration was found in the empirical work reviewed to be a function of a firms' access to knowledge and its possession of the capabilities for utilising the relationships and knowledge established (DeSanctis, Glass and Ensing, 2002).”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as DeSanctis, Glass and Ensing, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeSanctis, G., Glass, J. T., & Ensing, I. M.
Venue
Academy of Management Perspectives
Published
2002-08
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
55-66
ISSN
  • 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4529
OpenAlex
W2118924301
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
Keywords
technology-intensive companies, innovation management, adaptive organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review