Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 483

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Psychological Contracts in the Workplace: Understanding the Ties That Motivate

Rousseau, Denise M.·2004·Academy of Management Perspectives

Abstract

The article discusses aspects of psychological contracts on organizational behavior. Psychological contracts are designed to motivate workers to fulfill commitments made to employers when workers are confident that employers will reciprocate and fulfill their end of the bargain. How an employee interprets a psychological contract is shaped by many sources of information. Human resource practices such as training and performance appraisal processes can signal promised benefits and required contributions. Socialization events, particularly initial assignments to managers and co-workers, can have pervasive effects over time on the beliefs that a worker holds about the employment relationship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/ame.2004.12689213

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 483

Metadata

Authors
Rousseau, D. M.
Venue
Academy of Management Perspectives
Published
2004-02
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
120-127
ISSN
  • 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4529
OpenAlex
W2040594135
Cited by
483
References
0
FWCI
25.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological Contracts in the Workplace: Understanding the Ties That Motivate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/ame.2004.12689213
The paper
Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Psychological Contracts in the Workplace: Understanding the Ties That Motivate. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.12689213

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.