The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competing with dual business models: A contingency approach
Abstract
Executive Overview How can a company adopt two different business models in the same market? This question has become particularly pressing for an increasing number of established companies that have recently come under attack from “strategic innovators”—companies that attack the established players by using radically different business models. The success of these attackers in gaining market share has created a big dilemma for established companies. On the one hand, by embracing the new business models that the innovators have introduced in their markets, established companies can potentially take advantage of a great growth opportunity. On the other hand, because the new business models often conflict with the established ones, companies that try to compete by adopting both of them risk mismanaging both and destroying value. How, then, can established companies embrace the new business models without diluting and destroying their existing models? Our research explores this question and offers a contingency solution to this problem. We show that the challenge for companies is to balance the benefits of keeping the two business models separate while at the same time integrating them enough so as to allow them to exploit synergies with one another. We describe four possible strategies that companies can use to achieve such a balance and identify what separates success from failure for each strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308316058 · Cited by 2,702
Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025 · Cited by 2,580
Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 · Cited by 2,469
Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 · Cited by 2,431
Metadata
- Authors
- Markides, C., & Charitou, C. D.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Perspectives
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 22-36
- ISSN
- 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4529
- OpenAlex
- W2010095146
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competing with dual business models: A contingency approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/ame.2004.14776164
- The paper
- Markides, C., & Charitou, C. D. (2004). Competing with dual business models: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.14776164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.