The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Modest Proposal: How We might change the Process and Product of Managerial Research
Abstract
The article focuses on possible changes in the discipline of management science, and how the methodology and presentation of its research might be improved. The main goals of management science scholars are to reach the level of influence enjoyed by the other social sciences, especially economics, in the real world applications of their disciplines and to have more effect on actual managerial practices. London Business School has created a management innovation laboratory to collaborate with businesses on the development of improved managerial practice, and this could serve as a model for others. The methodology of academic research and scholarly publishing operate in an entirely different time frame than actual management, a difficulty that may be impossible to fully overcome. An examination of articles previously published in this publication indicate that management scientists have too often shown a preference for theoretical discussion rather than the collection of information on actual management practices and their outcomes. The huge body of knowledge created by management science in the past 50 years, however, is more than capable of being transformed into real world applications of benefit to business and society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action
Staw, B. M. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2 · Cited by 2,061 · cited 2×
“The resource-based view of strategy (Barney, 1991), the industry structure-conduct-performance paradigm in strategic management (Porter, 1979), transactions cost theory (Williamson, 1975), the relationship between agency theory and corporate governance (Jensen & Meckling, 1976), charismatic leadership (Bass, 1985), st…”
BackgroundPublication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
Mahoney, M. J. (1977) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173636 · Cited by 1,013
The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.454 · Cited by 912
Cited by
Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01070.x · Cited by 503
From Homogenization to Pluralism: International Management Research in the Academy and Beyond
Tsui, A. S. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.28166121 · Cited by 486
Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm
Carroll, B., Levy, L., & Richmond, D. (2008) · Leadership · doi:10.1177/1742715008095186 · Cited by 466
An Ounce of Prevention Is Worth a Pound of Cure: Improving Research Quality Before Data Collection
Aguinis, H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091231 · Cited by 304
von Krogh, G., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Haefliger, S. (2012) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.05.001 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfeffer, J.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1334-1345
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2169997196
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 30.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Modest Proposal: How We might change the Process and Product of Managerial Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amj.2007.28166117
- The paper
- Pfeffer, J. (2007). A Modest Proposal: How We might change the Process and Product of Managerial Research. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.