Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Modest Proposal: How We might change the Process and Product of Managerial Research

Pfeffer, Jeffrey·2007·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

The article focuses on possible changes in the discipline of management science, and how the methodology and presentation of its research might be improved. The main goals of management science scholars are to reach the level of influence enjoyed by the other social sciences, especially economics, in the real world applications of their disciplines and to have more effect on actual managerial practices. London Business School has created a management innovation laboratory to collaborate with businesses on the development of improved managerial practice, and this could serve as a model for others. The methodology of academic research and scholarly publishing operate in an entirely different time frame than actual management, a difficulty that may be impossible to fully overcome. An examination of articles previously published in this publication indicate that management scientists have too often shown a preference for theoretical discussion rather than the collection of information on actual management practices and their outcomes. The huge body of knowledge created by management science in the past 50 years, however, is more than capable of being transformed into real world applications of benefit to business and society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2007.28166117

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Pfeffer, J.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2007-12
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
1334-1345
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2169997196
Cited by
234
References
4
FWCI
30.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Modest Proposal: How We might change the Process and Product of Managerial Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amj.2007.28166117
The paper
Pfeffer, J. (2007). A Modest Proposal: How We might change the Process and Product of Managerial Research. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166117

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.