The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Publishing in AMJ—Part 2: Research Design
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is not appropriate to develop one's own short version, because when items are added or dropped from a scale, the psychometric properties change (see Bono and McNamara (2011) and Keller and Dansereau (2001)).”
From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as Bono and McNamara (2011)
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research
Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6 · Cited by 2,585
Becker, T. E. (2005) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428105278021 · Cited by 2,308
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682 · cited 1×
“…the definition and boundaries of the new construct , map its association with existing constructs, and avoid assumptions that scales with the same name reflect the same construct and that scales with different names reflect different constructs (i.e., jingle jangle fallacies [Block, 1995]).”
BackgroundGrant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.59215085 · Cited by 1,634
The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency.
Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.246 · Cited by 1,384
Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407908 · Cited by 1,373
Pillai, R., Schriesheim, C. A., & Williams, E. S. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500606 · Cited by 1,013
Agency Theory Revisited: CEO Return and Shareholder Interest Alignment
Nyberg, A. J., Fulmer, I. S., Gerhart, B. A., & Carpenter, M. A. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.54533188 · Cited by 324
The Effects Of Endowment And Loss Aversion In Managerial Stock Option Valuation
Devers, C. E., Wiseman, R. M., & Holmes, R. M. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24162384 · Cited by 132
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004 · Cited by 1,858
“It is not appropriate to develop one's own short version, because when items are added or dropped from a scale, the psychometric properties change (see Bono and McNamara (2011) and Keller and Dansereau (2001)). Both the SL-7 and SLBS-6 underwent the necessary psychometric work verifying that these short versions accur…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Critical Review and Best‐Practice Recommendations for Control Variable Usage
Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12103 · Cited by 1,731
Becker, T. E., Atinc, G., Breaugh, J. A., Carlson, K. D., Edwards, J. R., & Spector, P. E. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2053 · Cited by 989
Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. (2015) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002 · Cited by 712
Endrikat, J., Guenther, E., & Hoppe, H. (2014) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.004 · Cited by 627
Metadata
- Authors
- Bono, J. E., & McNamara, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- ORCID
- McNamara, Gerry
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 657-660
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W1974064116
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 83.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- research design, scholarly publishing, academic writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
