The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When Do Relational Resources Matter? Leveraging Portfolio Technological Resources for Breakthrough Innovation
Abstract
We examine the paradox of capabilities: although portfolio resources contribute to innovation success, and technologically capable firms have the ability to gain more such resources, firms' “competency traps” and the tension between value creation and value protection reduce benefits from portfolio resources for such firms. Results show that the quality and diversity of portfolio technological resources contribute to breakthrough innovation. The benefits are greater for firms with low internal strength and low internal diversity, thus suggesting positive synergy between portfolio and internal resources for such firms. Technologically strong firms, however, benefit from the quality of their portfolio resources when they overcome some of their competency traps.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255632 · Cited by 9,943
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
(2013) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr · Cited by 6,716
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
SOCIAL CAPITAL AND VALUE CREATION: THE ROLE OF INTRAFIRM NETWORKS.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257085 · Cited by 5,925
Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study
Ahuja, G. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667105 · Cited by 5,079
The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools
Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w8498 · Cited by 3,507
Cited by
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103
Resource-based theory in marketing
Kozlenkova, I. V., Samaha, S. A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-013-0336-7 · Cited by 882
Arunachalam, S., Ramaswami, S. N., Herrmann, P., & Walker, D. (2018) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0574-1 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 797-810
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2157610737
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 59.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Do Relational Resources Matter? Leveraging Portfolio Technological Resources for Breakthrough Innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amj.2011.64870140
- The paper
- Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2011). When Do Relational Resources Matter? Leveraging Portfolio Technological Resources for Breakthrough Innovation. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64870140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
