Cited by 165International Student and Expatriate ChallengesGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementCultural Differences and Values

Identifying and Training Adaptive Cross-Cultural Management Skills: The Crucial Role of Cultural Metacognition

Open access
Mor, Shira, Morris, Michael W., Joh, Johann·2013·Academy of Management Learning & Education

Abstract

For managers, intercultural effectiveness requires forging close working relationships with people from different cultural backgrounds (Black, Mendenhall, & Oddou, 1991). Recent research with executives has found that higher cultural metacognition is associated with affective closeness and creative collaboration in intercultural relationships (Chua, Morris, & Mor, & 2012). However, little is known about the social cognitive mechanisms that facilitate the performance of individuals who score high on cultural metacognition. We propose that one important question for cross-cultural research and training is identifying which metacognitive strategies enable successful intercultural collaborations. We suggest that one such strategy is “cultural perspective taking”—considering how another's cultural background shapes their behavior in a given context. We hypothesized that cultural perspective taking facilitates intercultural coordination and cooperation, and that a manipulation that boosts cultural perspective taking would be especially beneficial for individuals who score low in dispositional cultural metacognition. We found support for the above hypotheses in five studies using both quasi-field and experimental approaches. We discuss the implications of these findings for literatures on expatriate managers, cross-cultural training, cultural intelligence, and intercultural negotiations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amle.2012.0202

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual factors such as self-awareness, self-efficacy, social and relational self-efficacy, emotional stability, empathy, flexibility, and tolerance are important for success in expatriate adaptation.

    “É importante também para o sucesso nesse processo fatores individuais, tais como: a autoconsciência (Mor, Morris & Joh, 2013); auto eficácia; auto eficácia social, relacional e estabilidade emocional, empatia, flexibilidade, tolerância (Brandão, Magnani, & Medina, 2013).”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy as a proposal of treatment for expatriates in soccer (2019) · cites this paper as Mor, Morris & Joh, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mor, S., Morris, M. W., & Joh, J.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • London Business School (GB)
Venue
Academy of Management Learning & Education
Published
2013-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
453-475
ISSN
  • 1537-260X (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9585
OpenAlex
W2000146387
Cited by
165
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
27.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Academy of Management Learning and Education (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
cross-cultural management, cross-cultural collaboration, cross-cultural negotiation, intercultural training, expatriate managers, cultural intelligence, co-creation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review