Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 521

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is the Socially Responsible Corporation a Myth? The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Corporate Social Responsibility

Open access
Devinney, Timothy M.·2009·Academy of Management Perspectives

Abstract

Executive Overview Despite differences of opinion about the efficacy of corporate social responsibility, there is a general consensus among academics, policy makers, and practitioners that corporations operate with a social sanction that requires that they operate within the norms and mores of the societies in which they exist. In this article I argue that the notion of a socially responsible corporation is potentially an oxymoron because of the naturally conflicted nature of the corporation. This has profound implications for our understanding of corporate social responsibility, what we view as the relevant issues relating to it, and how we investigate its role and impact.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amp.2009.39985540

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Aguilera R. V., 2007, Academy of Management Review, 32, 836, 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275678 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Auger P., 2003, Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281, 10.1023/A:1022212816261 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Auger P., 2008, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 183, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Banerjee S. B., 2007, Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly, 10.4337/9781847208552 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baron D. P., 2000, Business and its environment
  6. Baumol W. J., 1996, Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 3, 10.1016/0883-9026(94)00014-X · DOI · Paper page
  7. Baumol W. J., 2007, Good capitalism, bad capitalism and the economics of growth and prosperity, 10.2139/ssrn.985843 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Brugmann J., 2007, Harvard Business Review, 1
  9. Chen J. C., Journal of Business Ethics
  10. Dean T. J., 1995, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 288, 10.2307/256737 · DOI · Paper page
  11. De Bakker F. G. A., 2005, Business and Society, 44, 283, 10.1177/0007650305278086 · DOI · Paper page
  12. de Winter R., 2001, Ethics and International Affairs, 15, 99, 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2001.tb00361.x · DOI
  13. Elkington J., 1998, Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business
  14. Fisman R., 2007, Social responsibility: Doing well by doing good? (Working paper)
  15. Friedman M., 1970, New York Times Magazine, 1
  16. Harjoto M. A., 2007, Why do firms engage in corporate social responsibility?
  17. Liston-Heyes C., 2007, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 95, 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2007.sp.00010 · DOI
  18. Maloney M. T., 1982, Journal of Law and Economics, 25, 99, 10.1086/467009 · DOI
  19. Margolis J. D., 2008, Harvard Business Review, 86, 19
  20. Margolis J. D., 2007, Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on corporate social and financial performance
  21. McClintock B., 1999, Review ofSocial Economy, 52, 507, 10.1080/00346769900000019 · doi:10.1080/00346769900000019
  22. McWilliams A., 2000, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Niskanen W. A., 1971, Bureaucracy and representative government
  24. Paull J., 2006, Journal of Bio-Dynamics Tasmania, 83, 14
  25. Prior D., 2008, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 160, 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00678.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. Reich R. B., 2007, Supercapitalism
  27. Reinhardt F. L., 2006, Toyota Motor Corporation: Launching Prius
  28. Renneboog L., 2007, The price of ethics: Evidence from socially responsible mutual funds (Finance Working Paper 168/2007)
  29. Renneboog L., 2007, Socially responsible investments: Methodology, risk exposure andper-formance
  30. Smith A., 1904, An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Book I, Chapter X, paragraph I.10.82)
  31. Wang H., 2008, Organization Science, 19, 143, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0271 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Yunus M., 2008, Creating a world without poverty
  33. Zimbardo P., 2007, The Lucifer effect

Cited by

See all 521

Metadata

Authors
Devinney, T. M.
Venue
Academy of Management Perspectives
Published
2009-05
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
44-56
ISSN
  • 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4529
OpenAlex
W2149321677
Cited by
521
References
1
FWCI
84.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is the Socially Responsible Corporation a Myth? The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Corporate Social Responsibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amp.2009.39985540
The paper
Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the Socially Responsible Corporation a Myth? The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.39985540

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.