The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence-Based Management: Concept Cleanup Time?
Abstract
Executive Overview The term evidence-based management (EBMgt) is relatively new, though the idea of using research evidence to help make managerial decisions is not. In this paper we identify and clarify a number of common misconceptions about EBMgt. Rather than a single rigid method, EBMgt is a family of approaches that support decision making. It is something done by practitioners, not scholars, although scholars have a critical role to play in helping to provide the infrastructure required for EBMgt. Properly conducted systematic reviews that summarize in an explicit way what is known and not known about a specific practice-related question are a cornerstone of EBMgt.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766 · cited 1×
“For example, one might consider the uses to which the well-established principles of goal setting have been applied (Locke & Latham, 2002) and evaluate the body of evidence (published and unpublished) that bears on the effectiveness of practitioner applications of goal-setting principles.”
MethodMethods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68 · Cited by 2,045
Pawson, R. (2006) · doi:10.4135/9781849209120 · Cited by 1,791
Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview
Stefan, A., & Paul, L. (2008) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2008.35590353 · Cited by 1,759
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747
Self-citationFormulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews
Counsell, C. (1997) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-127-5-199709010-00008 · Cited by 505
Cited by
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987
Sustainability‐oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review
Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12068 · Cited by 1,584
Self-citationPeloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0213-6 · Cited by 1,076
Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12102 · Cited by 995
Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool
Briner, R. B., & Denyer, D. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007 · Cited by 835
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Briner, R. B., Denyer, D., & Rousseau, D. M.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Perspectives
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2009-11-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 19-32
- ISSN
- 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157119447
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 33.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence-Based Management: Concept Cleanup Time? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amp.2009.45590138
- The paper
- Briner, R. B., Denyer, D., & Rousseau, D. M. (2009). Evidence-Based Management: Concept Cleanup Time? Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.45590138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.