Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Business Model Innovation: What Can the Ambidexterity Literature Teach US?

Markides, Constantinos C.·2013·Academy of Management Perspectives

Abstract

One of the issues addressed in the growing literature on business model innovation is how to compete with two business models simultaneously. Unfortunately, this body of work lacks a theoretical foundation. I propose that the challenge of managing two different and conflicting business models simultaneously can be framed as an ambidexterity challenge. This implies that ideas and theoretical concepts from the ambidexterity literature can be used to explore issues pertinent to the business model literature. I apply this idea to explore four specific areas where the ambidexterity literature could guide research on the challenge of managing two business models simultaneously and identify several insights that can guide future research on business model innovation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amp.2012.0172

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 411

Metadata

Authors
Markides, C. C.
Venue
Academy of Management Perspectives
Published
2013-11
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
313-323
ISSN
  • 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4529
OpenAlex
W2157448104
Cited by
411
References
3
FWCI
87.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Business Model Innovation: What Can the Ambidexterity Literature Teach US? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amp.2012.0172
The paper
Markides, C. C. (2013). Business Model Innovation: What Can the Ambidexterity Literature Teach US? Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0172

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.