The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responsible Leadership: Theoretical Issues and Research Directions
Abstract
This article serves as an overview of the articles included in this symposium as well as a consideration of how the topic of responsible leadership can be framed in terms of research directions. Specifically, we focus on how the included articles bring attention to the theoretical divergence within the literature. To help address the variations of responsible leadership theories, we identify five areas in need of further research: (1) responsible leadership processes and outcomes, (2) stakeholder priorities, (3) training and development, (4) globalization and macro-level forces, and (5) measurement and assessment. In our discussion of each area, we elaborate by referring to other articles in the symposium, and we provide examples of specific issues that challenge responsible leadership research and implementation. Additionally, because responsible leadership concerns both the micro and macro levels of analysis, our discussion considers individuals, groups, and organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
Ethical leadership: A review and future directions
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004 · Cited by 4,029
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.413 · Cited by 2,385
Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,058
de Luque, M. S., Washburn, N. T., Waldman, D. A., & House, R. J. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.4.626 · Cited by 340
Self-citation
Cited by
A Review of the Nonmarket Strategy Literature: Toward a Multi-Theoretical Integration
Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., & Siegel, D. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206315617241 · Cited by 697
Reviewing Leadership Styles: Overlaps and the Need for a New ‘Full‐Range’ Theory
Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. T. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12082 · Cited by 411
Afsar, B., Maqsoom, A., Shahjehan, A., Afridi, S. A., Nawaz, A., & Fazliani, H. (2020) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1806 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Waldman, D. A., & Balven, R. M.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Perspectives
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 224-234
- ISSN
- 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4529
- OpenAlex
- W2011193823
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 29.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responsible Leadership: Theoretical Issues and Research Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amp.2014.0016
- The paper
- Waldman, D. A., & Balven, R. M. (2014). Responsible Leadership: Theoretical Issues and Research Directions. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
