Cited by 41Digital Platforms and EconomicsInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingBusiness Strategy and Innovation

Positive, Negative, and Amplified Network Externalities in Platform Markets

Karhu, Kimmo, Heiskala, Mikko, Ritala, Paavo, Thomas, Llewellyn D. W.·2024·Academy of Management Perspectives

Abstract

Platforms are a dominant model for coordinating complex economic interactions. Platforms are distinguished by growth through network effects: an increase in the number (N) of platform actors (or complements produced by them) on one side makes the platform more valuable for an actor on the same or other side (and vice versa). This paper unbundles the network effect—the feedback loop—into directional and distinct types of network externalities that define the value received by each platform side. For example, value from a network externality may relate to variety (e.g., Google Play apps) or availability (e.g., Uber rides). Furthermore, at times, network externalities can have a negative impact. Although the existing literature recognizes some of these constituents, we lack an integrative framework. To address this gap, we first distinguish the heterogeneity and persistence of platform value units to identify a 2 × 2 typology of four positive and negative network externalities: quantity versus rivalry, accumulation versus fragmentation, variety versus choice overload, and utility versus degradation. Second, we generalize network connectivity and horizontal complementarity as two types of network externality amplification. Third, we demonstrate how all these dynamics play together in interactions that ultimately underscore the platform value and growth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amp.2023.0119

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 41

Authors
Karhu, K., Heiskala, M., Ritala, P., & Thomas, L. D. W.
Affiliations
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
  • IESE Business School (ES)
Venue
Academy of Management Perspectives
Published
2024-08
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
349-367
ISSN
  • 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4529
OpenAlex
W4398168631
Cited by
41
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 6
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
Keywords
network effects, platform markets, platform value, platform growth, network connectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review