Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hypothesis of Work Behavior Revisited and an Extension

Abraham K. Korman·1976·Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Research generated by the Korman self-consistency motivational hypothesis is reviewed. Thirty-three studies are cited, with most field study evidence supportive. Laboratory research has resulted in mixed findings, but this may be due to methodological problems. An extension accounting for changes in motivational processes over time is proposed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.2307/257359

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Korman, A. K.
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
1976-01-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
50-63
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143169581
Cited by
300
References
2
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hypothesis of Work Behavior Revisited and an Extension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/257359
The paper
Korman, A. K. (1976). Hypothesis of Work Behavior Revisited and an Extension. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/257359

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.