Cited by 945Team Dynamics and PerformanceSocial Power and Status DynamicsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms

Feldman, Daniel C.·1984·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

This paper examines why group norms are enforced and how group norms develop. It is argued here that groups are likely to bring under normative control only those behaviors that ensure group survival, increase the predictability of group members' behavior, avoid embarrassing interpersonal situations, or give expression to the group's central values. Group norms develop through explicit statements by supervisors or co-workers, critical events in the group's history, primacy, or carry-over behaviors from past situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/258231

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The history of the team may provide leaders with information about which process is likely to be dominant in the future.

    “For instance, the history of the team may provide leaders with information about which process is likely to be dominant in the future (Feldman, 1984;Kelly & Barsade, 2001).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feldman, D. C.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Feldman, Daniel C.
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1984-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
47
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131857427
Cited by
945
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 35
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
group norms, norm development, norm enforcement, normative control, group survival, behavioral predictability, group values, critical events, primacy effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review