Cited by 80Complex Network Analysis TechniquesDigital Communication and LanguageSocial Media and Politics

The Emergence of Conventions in Online Social Networks

Open access
Kooti, Farshad, Yang, Haeryun, Cha, Meeyoung, Gummadi, Krishna, Mason, Winter·2021·Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Abstract

The way in which social conventions emerge in communities has been of interest to social scientists for decades. Here we report on the emergence of a particular social convention on Twitter—the way to indicate a tweet is being reposted and to attribute the content to its source. Initially, different variations were invented and spread through the Twitter network. The inventors and early adopters were well-connected, active, core members of the Twitter community. The diffusion networks of these conventions were dense and highly clustered, so no single user was critical to the adoption of the conventions. Despite being invented at different times and having different adoption rates, only two variations came to be widely adopted. In this paper we describe this process in detail, highlighting insights and raising questions about how social conventions emerge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/icwsm.v6i1.14267

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These dynamics reflect common types of online interactions where community members engage with a large anonymous population, leading to adoption of linguistic and behavioral conventions.

    “These dynamics reflect common types of online interactions where community members engage directly with a large, often anonymous population, using chat interfaces or messaging technologies, leading to the adoption of linguistic and behavioral conventions that enable effective coordination with other participants’ expectations (9, 23, 52, 53).”

    From Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populations (2025) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Introduction and Methodology describe the emergence and widespread adoption of retweeting conventions in a large Twitter community. The paper does not establish that participants engaged directly with a large, often anonymous population through chat or messaging, or that adopting the convention enabled coordination with others’ expectations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rogers, E. M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kooti, F., Yang, H., Cha, M., Gummadi, K., & Mason, W.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Software Systems (DE)
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Published
2021-08-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
194-201
ISSN
  • 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-0770
OpenAlex
W1814109117
Cited by
80
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
social conventions, convention emergence, Twitter, retweets, diffusion of innovations, early adopters, network centrality, social networking sites, community norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review