Cited by 2,323Ethics in Business and EducationSocial Capital and NetworksSocial Power and Status Dynamics

TRUST: THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS

Hosmer, Larue Tone·1995·The Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Numerous researchers have proposed that trust is essential for understanding interpersonal and group behavior, managerial effectiveness, economic exchange and social or political stability, yet according to a majority of these scholars, this concept has never been precisely defined. This article reviews definitions from various approaches within organizational theory, examines the consistencies and differences, and proposes that trust is based upon an underlying assumption of an implicit moral duty. This moral duty—an anomaly in much of organizational theory—has made a precise definition problematic. Trust also is examined from philosophical ethics, and a synthesis of the organizational and philosophical definitions that emphasizes an explicit sense of moral duty and is based upon accepted ethical principles of analysis is proposed. This new definition has the potential to combine research from the two fields of study in important areas of inquiry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/258851

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosmer, L. T.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Hosmer, Larue Tone
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Published
1995-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
379
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129125364
Cited by
2,323
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 113 · 2012: 112
FWCI
124.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
trust, moral obligation, organizational theory, philosophy of ethics, ethical principles, interpersonal behavior, group behavior, management effectiveness, economic exchange, social stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review