The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Views from Inside and Outside: Integrating Emic and Etic Insights about Culture and Justice Judgment
Abstract
We analyze forms of synergy between emic and etic approaches to research on culture and cognition. Drawing on the justice judgment literature, we describe dynamics through which the two approaches stimulate each other's progress. Moreover, we delineate ways in which integrative emic/etic frameworks overcome limitations of narrower frameworks in modeling culture and cognition. Finally, we identify advantages of integrative frameworks in guiding responses to the diverse justice sensitivities in international organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585
Argonauts of the Western Pacific
Malinowski, B. (2002) · doi:10.4324/9780203421260 · Cited by 2,160
Cited by
Beyond national culture and culture-centricism: A reply to Gould and Grein (2009)
Leung, K., Bhagat, R., Buchan, N. R., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. B. (2011) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.38 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, M. W., Leung, K. Y., Ames, D. R., & Lickel, B. A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 781-796
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089543278
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
