Cited by 343Business Strategy and InnovationInnovation and Knowledge ManagementEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

Achieving Cooperation in Multiparty Alliances: a Social Dilemma Approach to Partnership Management

Zeng, Ming, Chen, Xiao-Ping·2003·Academy of Management Review

Abstract

We propose a social dilemma approach to cooperation induction in multiparty alliances. We first establish that managing the inherent tension between cooperation and competition in alliances is essentially a social dilemma, where an individually rational but socially defecting choice may lead to a higher payoff for an individual partner but where, once all partners adopt such a strategy, the alliance will fail. We then develop propositions on how partners can improve their chances for cooperation, and we discuss the limitations of the social dilemma approach and its implications for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2003.10899383

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, M., & Chen, X.-P.
Affiliations
  • INSEAD (FR)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Published
2003-10
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
587-605
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
OpenAlex
W2116111091
Cited by
343
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
FWCI
33.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
social dilemmas, partnership management, competition and cooperation, alliance failure, individual rationality, inter-organizational cooperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review