The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge for Theory and Practice
Abstract
We examine three related ways in which the gap between theory and practice has been framed. One approach views it as a knowledge transfer problem, a second argues that theory and practice represent distinct kinds of knowledge, and a third incorporates a strategy of arbitrage--leading to the view that the gap is a knowledge production problem. We propose a method of engaged scholarship for addressing the knowledge production problem, arguing that engaged scholarship not only enhances the relevance of research for practice but also contributes significantly to advancing research knowledge in a given domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
Jehn, K. A. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393638 · Cited by 4,050
Bounded rationality and organizational learning
Simon, H. A. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.125 · Cited by 3,028
That's Interesting!: Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology
Davis, M. S. (1971) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/004839317100100211 · Cited by 1,219
The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences
Whitley, R. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199240531.001.0001 · Cited by 1,076
Cited by
GREENHALGH, T., JACKSON, C., SHAW, S., & JANAMIAN, T. (2016) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12197 · Cited by 1,288
Greenhalgh, T., Hinton, L., Finlay, T., Macfarlane, A., Fahy, N., Clyde, B., & Chant, A. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12888 · Cited by 1,059
Jull, J., Giles, A., & Graham, I. D. (2017) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3 · Cited by 651
Short, J. C., Broberg, J. C., Cogliser, C. C., & Brigham, K. H. (2010) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109335949 · Cited by 644
Gond, J., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2016) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12074 · Cited by 405
Why Do Evaluations of eHealth Programs Fail? An Alternative Set of Guiding Principles
Greenhalgh, T., & Russell, J. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000360 · Cited by 273
Study Designs for Effectiveness and Translation Research
Mercer, S. L., DeVinney, B. J., Fine, L. J., Green, L. W., & Dougherty, D. (2007) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.005 · Cited by 222
From Scarcity to Abundance: Scholars and Scholarship in an Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Grimes, M., von Krogh, G., Feuerriegel, S., Rink, F., & Gruber, M. (2023) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2023.4006 · Cited by 180
Sustaining organizational culture change in health systems
Willis, C. D., Saul, J., Bevan, H., Scheirer, M. A., Best, A., Greenhalgh, T., Mannion, R., Cornelissen, E., Howland, D., Jenkins, E., et al. (2016) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-07-2014-0117 · Cited by 178
Wells, P. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026615590882 · Cited by 93
Hah, H., & Goldin, D. S. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/33540 · Cited by 81
Advancing the Science of Implementation: A Workshop Summary
Chambers, D. A. (2008) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0146-7 · Cited by 46
Chandrasekaran, A., Linderman, K., & Sting, F. J. (2018) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2018.11.003 · Cited by 37
Solberg, L. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-9 · Cited by 28
How can primary care cross the quality chasm?
Solberg, L. I., Elward, K. S., Phillips, W. R., Gill, J. M., Swanson, G., Main, D. S., Yawn, B. P., Mold, J. W., Phillips, R. L., & for the Napcrg Committee on Advancing the Science of Family Medicine (2009) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.951 · Cited by 24
Ramanadhan, S., Minsky, S., Martinez-Dominguez, V., & Viswanath, K. (2017) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-017-0488-y · Cited by 26
Management Control Research and the Management of Uncertainty: Rethinking Knowledge in Management
Saulpic, O., & Zarlowski, P. (2014) · Management Control and Uncertainty · doi:10.1057/9781137392121_14 · Cited by 15
Colquhoun, A., Geary, J., & Goodman, K. J. (2013) · International Journal of Circumpolar Health · doi:10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21232 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Van De Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 802-821
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W2051066739
- Cited by
- 1,663
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 81.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
