Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IMAGINING AND RATIONALIZING OPPORTUNITIES: INDUCTIVE REASONING AND THE CREATION AND JUSTIFICATION OF NEW VENTURES.

CORNELISSEN, JOEP P., CLARKE, JEAN S.·2010·Academy of Management Review

Abstract

We argue that creating novel ventures consists of inductive analogical or metaphor-ical reasoning, which generates a platform for the creation and commercialization of novel ventures and facilitates the comprehension and justification of a venture. We argue that such inductive reasoning is shaped by two determinants (the applicability of prior entrepreneurial experience and the motivation to resolve uncertainty and acquire legitimacy) that interrelate to predict and explain patterns of analogical and metaphorical reasoning by which novice and experienced entrepreneurs construct meaning for themselves as well as others in the early stages of creating a venture. The creation of new ventures is a process by which entrepreneurs come to imagine the oppor-tunity for novel ventures, refine their ideas, and, after an initial investment, justify their ventures to relevant others to gain much-needed support and legitimacy (e.g., Alvarez & Barney, 2007; Mc-Mullen & Shepherd, 2006). Yet how do entrepre-neurs come to create and justify new ventures in such a way that they acquire institutional legit-imacy and the necessary resources for venture growth? Despite an increase in conceptualizing and specifying the process of entrepreneurship (e.g., Zott & Huy, 2007), research has not fully addressed this question, with most accounts the-oretically or empirically equating the processwith antecedent cognitive scripts or characteristics of entrepreneurs (e.g., Baron & Ensley, 2006; Busen-itz & Barney, 1997; Shane, 2000) or with perfor-mance outcomes and the achievement of legiti-macy in an industry (Aldrich & Fiol, 1994; Starr &

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2010.53502700

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
CORNELISSEN, J. P., & CLARKE, J. S.
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Published
2010-10-01
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
539-557
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121013771
Cited by
462
References
7
FWCI
48.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IMAGINING AND RATIONALIZING OPPORTUNITIES: INDUCTIVE REASONING AND THE CREATION AND JUSTIFICATION OF NEW VENTURES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amr.2010.53502700
The paper
CORNELISSEN, J. P., & CLARKE, J. S. (2010). IMAGINING AND RATIONALIZING OPPORTUNITIES: INDUCTIVE REASONING AND THE CREATION AND JUSTIFICATION OF NEW VENTURES. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.53502700

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.