The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IMAGINING AND RATIONALIZING OPPORTUNITIES: INDUCTIVE REASONING AND THE CREATION AND JUSTIFICATION OF NEW VENTURES.
Abstract
We argue that creating novel ventures consists of inductive analogical or metaphor-ical reasoning, which generates a platform for the creation and commercialization of novel ventures and facilitates the comprehension and justification of a venture. We argue that such inductive reasoning is shaped by two determinants (the applicability of prior entrepreneurial experience and the motivation to resolve uncertainty and acquire legitimacy) that interrelate to predict and explain patterns of analogical and metaphorical reasoning by which novice and experienced entrepreneurs construct meaning for themselves as well as others in the early stages of creating a venture. The creation of new ventures is a process by which entrepreneurs come to imagine the oppor-tunity for novel ventures, refine their ideas, and, after an initial investment, justify their ventures to relevant others to gain much-needed support and legitimacy (e.g., Alvarez & Barney, 2007; Mc-Mullen & Shepherd, 2006). Yet how do entrepre-neurs come to create and justify new ventures in such a way that they acquire institutional legit-imacy and the necessary resources for venture growth? Despite an increase in conceptualizing and specifying the process of entrepreneurship (e.g., Zott & Huy, 2007), research has not fully addressed this question, with most accounts the-oretically or empirically equating the processwith antecedent cognitive scripts or characteristics of entrepreneurs (e.g., Baron & Ensley, 2006; Busen-itz & Barney, 1997; Shane, 2000) or with perfor-mance outcomes and the achievement of legiti-macy in an industry (Aldrich & Fiol, 1994; Starr &
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizing and the process of sensemaking
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133 · Cited by 6,943
Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions
Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(98)00033-0 · Cited by 5,994
Institutional conditions for diffusion
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/bf00993595 · Cited by 2,114
Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.30744031 · Cited by 1,218
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic: Why the Adjustments Are Insufficient
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x · Cited by 920 · cited 1×
“This attributional activity is also likely to increase the entrepreneur’s feeling of efficacy in social interaction (Epley & Gilovich, 2006).”
BackgroundUmbrella Advocates Versus Validity Police: A Life-Cycle Model
Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.199 · Cited by 609
Coordination as Energy-in-Conversation
Quinn, R. W., & Dutton, J. E. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281422 · Cited by 381
Cited by
Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177 · Cited by 1,764
Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation
Martins, L. L., Rindova, V. P., & Greenbaum, B. E. (2015) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1191 · Cited by 581
Communication, Organizing and Organization: An Overview and Introduction to the Special Issue
Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840611410836 · Cited by 585
Self-citationPutting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis
Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0381 · Cited by 391
Self-citationCapital is not enough: Innovation in developing economies
Bradley, S. W., McMullen, J. S., Artz, K., & Simiyu, E. M. (2012) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01043.x · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- CORNELISSEN, J. P., & CLARKE, J. S.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2010-10-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 539-557
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121013771
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 48.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IMAGINING AND RATIONALIZING OPPORTUNITIES: INDUCTIVE REASONING AND THE CREATION AND JUSTIFICATION OF NEW VENTURES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amr.2010.53502700
- The paper
- CORNELISSEN, J. P., & CLARKE, J. S. (2010). IMAGINING AND RATIONALIZING OPPORTUNITIES: INDUCTIVE REASONING AND THE CREATION AND JUSTIFICATION OF NEW VENTURES. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.53502700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.