The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changing with the Times: An Integrated View of Identity, Legitimacy, and New Venture Life Cycles
Abstract
To acquire resources, new ventures need to be perceived as legitimate. For this to occur, a venture must meet the expectations of various audiences with differing norms, standards, and values as the venture evolves and grows. We investigate how the organizational identity of a technology venture must adapt to meet the expectations of critical resource providers at each stage of its organizational life cycle. In so doing, we provide a temporal perspective on the interactions among identity, organizational legitimacy, institutional environments, and entrepreneurial resource acquisition for technology ventures. The core assertion from this conceptual analysis is that entrepreneurial ventures confront multiple legitimacy thresholds as they evolve and grow. We identify and discuss three key insights related to entrepreneurs’ efforts to cross those thresholds at different organizational life cycle stages: institutional pluralism, venture-identity embeddedness, and legitimacy buffering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177 · Cited by 2,228
The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action
Staw, B. M. (1981) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1981.4285694 · Cited by 1,693
OLSON, M. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjsf3ts · Cited by 1,601
Sine, W. D., David, R. J., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0300 · Cited by 241
Cited by
Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization
Eller, R., Alford, P., Kallmünzer, A., & Peters, M. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.004 · Cited by 837
Signaling by early stage startups: US government research grants and venture capital funding
Islam, M., Fremeth, A., & Marcus, A. (2018) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.10.001 · Cited by 282
Liminal movement by digital platform‐based sharing economy ventures: The case of Uber Technologies
Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., Roberts, A., & Xu, L. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3148 · Cited by 274
The paradox of new venture legitimation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem
Kuratko, D. F., Fisher, G., Bloodgood, J. M., & Hornsby, J. S. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9870-x · Cited by 244
Self-citationFisher, G., Stevenson, R., Neubert, E., Burnell, D., & Kuratko, D. F. (2020) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12584 · Cited by 200
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 383-409
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W2278973318
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 42.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing with the Times: An Integrated View of Identity, Legitimacy, and New Venture Life Cycles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amr.2013.0496
- The paper
- Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. (2016). Changing with the Times: An Integrated View of Identity, Legitimacy, and New Venture Life Cycles. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.