The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of recurrent urinary tract infection in women
Open accessAbstract
Recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common presentation to urologists and family doctors. Survey data suggest that 1 in 3 women will have had a diagnosed and treated UTI by age 24 and more than half will be affected in their lifetime.1 In a 6-month study of college-aged women, 27% of these UTIs were found to recur once and 3% a second time.2 The following topics are reviewed in this guideline. We also include a summary of recommendations (Text box 1). Text box 1. Summary of recommendations Definition of recurrent uncomplicated UTI An uncomplicated UTI is one that occurs in a healthy host in the absence of structural or functional abnormalities of the urinary tract. Recurrent uncomplicated UTI may be defined as 3 or more uncomplicated UTIs in 12 months (Level 4 evidence, Grade C recommendation). Recurrent UTIs occur due to bacterial reinfection or bacterial persistence. Persistence involves the same bacteria not being eradicated in the urine 2 weeks after sensitivity-adjusted treatment. A reinfection is a recurrence with a different organism, the same organism in more than 2 weeks, or a sterile intervening culture (Level 4 evidence, Grade C recommendation). Diagnosis of recurrent uncomplicated UTI Clinical diagnosis of each UTI episode is supported by symptoms of dysuria, frequency, urgency, hematuria, back pain, self-diagnosis of UTI, nocturia, costovertebral tenderness and the absence of vaginal discharge or irritation (Level 1 evidence, Grade A recommendation). Complicated causes of UTI may also be ruled out on history and physical examination (Table 1). Uroflowmetry and determining post void residual are optional tests in post-menopausal women to exclude complicated causes of UTI (Level 3 evidence, Grade C recommendation). Culture and sensitivity analysis should be performed when symptomatic and in 2 weeks from sensitivity-adjusted treatment to confirm UTI, guide further treatment and exclude persistence. (Level 4 evidence, Grade C recommendation) Investigation of recurrent uncomplicated UTI Cystoscopy and imaging are not routinely necessary in all women with recurrent UTI (Level 2 evidence, Grade B recommendation). Women with risk factors (Table 2) for a complicated cause for recurrent urinary tract infection should be evaluated by cystoscopy and imaging. Women suspected of having a complicated UTI (Table 2) without knowledge of a specific abnormality (Table 1) should receive a CT urogram or abdominopelvic ultrasound +/− abdominal x-ray. Women suspected of having a specific cause of UTI (Table 1) should be imaged in consultation with a radiologist or the 2011 ACR guidelines (Level 4 evidence, Grade C Recommendation). Indications for specialist referral Specialist referral is recommended for investigation of women with risk factors for complicated UTI (Table 2), surgical correction of a cause of UTI (Table 1), or when the diagnosis of recurrent uncomplicated UTI is uncertain (Level 4 evidence, Grade C Recommendation). Prophylactic measures against recurrent uncomplicated UTI Conservative measures including limiting spermicide use and postcoital voiding lack evidence for their efficacy but are unlikely to be harmful (Level 4 evidence, Grade C recommendation). Cranberry products have conflicting evidence for their efficacy (Level 1 evidence, Grade D recommendation). Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (Table 3) is effective at preventing UTI. (Level 1 evidence, Grade A recommendation). Postcoital antibiotic prophylaxis (Table 3) within 2 hours of coitus is also effective at preventing UTI (Level 1 evidence, Grade A recommendation). Self-start antibiotic therapy with a 3-day treatment dose antibiotic at the onset of symptoms is another safe option for the treatment of recurrent uncomplicated UTI (Level 1 evidence, Grade A recommendation). Vaginal estrogen creams or rings may also reduce the risk of clinical UTI relative to placebo or no treatment in postmenopausal women (Level 1 evidence, Grade A recommendation). Due to a lack of comparative evidence, the decision to begin therapy, choice of therapy and duration should be based on patient preference, allergies, local resistance patterns, prior susceptibility, cost and side effects (Level 4 evidence, Grade C recommendation). View it in a separate window UTI: urinary tract infection; ACR: American College of Radiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections
Jepson, R. G., & Craig, J. C. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001321.pub4 · Cited by 248
Cited by
Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: AUA/CUA/SUFU Guideline
Anger, J., Lee, U., Ackerman, A. L., Chou, R., Chughtai, B., Clemens, J. Q., Hickling, D., Kapoor, A., Kenton, K. S., Kaufman, M. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000000296 · Cited by 489
Self-citationUrinary Tract Infections: The Current Scenario and Future Prospects
Mancuso, G., Midiri, A., Gerace, E., Marra, M., Zummo, S., & Biondo, C. (2023) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens12040623 · Cited by 396
Kim, A., Ahn, J. H., Choi, W. S., Park, H. K., Kim, S., Paick, S. H., & Kim, H. G. (2021) · International Neurourology Journal · doi:10.5213/inj.2040472.236 · Cited by 22
Microbiota Ecosystem in Recurrent Cystitis and the Immunological Microenvironment of Urothelium
Dominoni, M., Scatigno, A. L., La Verde, M., Bogliolo, S., Melito, C., Gritti, A., Pasquali, M. F., Torella, M., & Gardella, B. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11040525 · Cited by 13
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): A Review and Proposal for Clinicians
Sgarabotto, D., Andretta, E., & Sgarabotto, C. (2025) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics14010022 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Dason, S., Dason, J. T., & Kapoor, A.
- Venue
- Canadian Urological Association Journal
- Published
- 2011-10-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 316-322
- ISSN
- 1911-6470 (ISSN-L)
- 1920-1214
- OpenAlex
- W2053030021
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.