Novel survey disseminated through Twitter supports its utility for networking, disseminating research, advocacy, clinical practice and other professional goals
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Twitter use has grown exponentially within the urological community. We aimed to determine the perceptions of the impact of Twitter on users' clinical practice, research, and other professional activities. METHODS: We performed an 11-item online survey of Twitter contributors during two major urological meetings: the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Urological Association (AUA) annual meetings. During the EAU 2014 meeting, we distributed the survey via the meeting official Twitter feed. During the AUA 2014 meeting, we applied a new method by directly sending the survey to Twitter contributors. We performed a subset analysis for assessing the perceived impact of Twitter on the clinical practice of physicians. RESULTS: Among 312 total respondents, the greatest perceived benefits of Twitter among users were for networking (97%) and disseminating information (96%), followed by research (75%), advocacy (74%) and career development (62%). In total, 65% of Twitter users have dealt with guidelines on online medical professionalism and 71% of physician users found that Twitter had an impact on their clinical practice, and 33% had made a clinical decision based on an online case discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that Twitter users in the urological community perceive important benefits. These benefits extend to multiple professional domains, particularly networking, disseminating information, remote conference participation, research, and advocacy. This is the first study that has been disseminated to targeted individuals from the urological community directly through tweets, providing a proof of principle for this research method.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A total of 8 studies were conducted in several countries simultaneously.
“A total of 8 studies were conducted in several countries simultaneously [32-39].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube were specifically targeted social media/social networking sites in 7 studies.
“Twitter [38,44,80,91,110], Instagram [101], and YouTube [37] were specifically targeted SM/SNSs in 7 studies.”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
Most included studies (n=77) had clear ethical statements within the paper either stating ethical board approval or exemption, and 11 studies did not explicitly report an ethical statement.
“Most studies included (n=77) had clear ethical statements within the paper either stating ethical board approval or exemption, and 11 studies did not explicitly report an ethical statement [37-39,53,54,72,74,90,105,108,117].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
Professional networking and collaborations on social media enable development and building of professional identities for health care professions.
“Professional networking and collaborations on SM enable the development and building of professional identities for health care professions [34,38,39,45,67,73,104].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
Professional networking and collaborations on social media enable the development and building of professional identities for health care professions.
“Professional networking and collaborations on SM enable the development and building of professional identities for health care professions [34,38,39,45,67,73,104].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube were specifically targeted social media or social networking sites in 7 studies.
“Twitter [38,44,80,91,110], Instagram [101], and YouTube [37] were specifically targeted SM/SNSs in 7 studies.”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
Social media have enabled the creation of communities for support.
“Besides providing the opportunity for connecting with others and sharing experiences [38,39,46,53,69,72,78,106-108], SM have enabled the creation of communities for support.”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
Benefits of social media on e-professionalism of health care professionals can be seen as improvements of established networks or possibilities for collaboration through social media sites.
“Benefits of SM on e-professionalism of HCPs can be seen as improvements of established networks or possibilities for collaboration through SM sites [33, 34, 36, 38, 39, 44-46, 53, 69, 72, 76, 78, 79, 92, 97, 106-108, 117].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
Cites
Eysenbach, G. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34 · Cited by 6,480 · see citing works
Online Recruitment Methods for Web-Based and Mobile Health Studies: A Review of the Literature
Lane, T. S., Armin, J. S., & Gordon, J. S. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4359 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Wilkinson, S., Basto, M. Y., Perovic, G., Lawrentschuk, N., & Murphy, D. G. (2014) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.12910 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
International Urology Journal Club via Twitter: 12-Month Experience
Thangasamy, I., Leveridge, M., Davies, B., Finelli, A., Stork, B., & Woo, H. H. (2014) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.034 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Use of social media in urology: data from the A merican U rological A ssociation ( AUA )
Loeb, S., Bayne, C. E., Frey, C., Davies, B., Averch, T. D., Woo, H. H., Stork, B., Cooperberg, M. R., & Eggener, S. E. (2013) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.12586 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Dramatic Increase in Social Media in Urology
Matta, R., Doiron, C., & Leveridge, M. (2014) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.043 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
The emerging use of T witter by urological journals
Nason, G. J., O’Kelly, F., Kelly, M. E., Phelan, N., Manecksha, R. P., Lawrentschuk, N., & Murphy, D. G. (2014) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.12840 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Engaging responsibly with social media: the BJUI guidelines
Murphy, D. G., Loeb, S., Basto, M. Y., Challacombe, B. J., Trinh, Q., Leveridge, M., Morgan, T. M., Prokar Dasgupta, A., & Bultitude, M. F. (2014) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.12788 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citationEuropean Association of Urology (@Uroweb) Recommendations on the Appropriate Use of Social Media
Morgan Rouprêt, A., Morgan, T. M., Boström, P. J., Cooperberg, M. R., Kutikov, A., Linton, K. D., Palou, J., Martínez‐Piñeiro, L., van der Poel, H. G., Wijburg, C. J., et al. (2014) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.046 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
The Role of Social Media in Recruiting for Clinical Trials in Pregnancy
Shere, M., Zhao, X. Y., & Koren, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092744 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists
Fuoco, M., & Leveridge, M. J. (2015) · BJU International · doi:10.1111/bju.12855 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Loeb, S., Catto, J. W. F., & Kutikov, A. (2014) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.048 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationCanvasser, N. E., Ramo, C., Morgan, T. M., Zheng, K., Hollenbeck, B. K., & Ghani, K. R. (2014) · Journal of Endourology · doi:10.1089/end.2014.0329 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Social media makes global urology meetings truly global
Loeb, S. (2015) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.13027 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationUpdated Survey of Social Media Use by Members of the American Urological Association
Loeb, S., Bayne, C. E., Frey, C., Davies, B., Averch, T. D., Woo, H. H., Stork, B., Cooperberg, M. R., Griebling, T. L., & Eggener, S. E. (2015) · Urology Practice · doi:10.1016/j.urpr.2014.09.009 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review
Chen, J., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/17917 · Cited by 1,073 · see citing works
Vukušić Rukavina, T., Viskić, J., Machala Poplašen, L., Relić, D., Marelić, M., Jokic, D., & Sedak, K. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25770 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
“…which physicians establish interpersonal trust on SM [36,45,92] are novel insights into the domain of e-professionalism of HCPs on SM. Professional networking and collaborations on SM enable the development and building of professional identities for health care professions [34,38,39,45,67,73,104].”
InfluentialAlsyouf, M. M., Stokes, P., Hur, D., Amasyali, A. S., Ruckle, H. C., & Hu, B. R. (2019) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.14787 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Twitter Mentions and Academic Citations in the Urologic Literature
Hayon, S., Tripathi, H., Stormont, I. M., Dunne, M. M., Naslund, M. J., & Siddiqui, M. M. (2018) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.041 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
The Ethical and Professional Use of Social Media in Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Bennett, K. G., Berlin, N. L., MacEachern, M., Buchman, S. R., Preminger, B. A., & Vercler, C. J. (2018) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000004692 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Borgmann, H., Cooperberg, M. R., Murphy, D. G., Loeb, S., N’Dow, J., Ribal, M. J., Woo, H. H., Morgan Rouprêt, A., Winterbottom, A. J., Wijburg, C. J., et al. (2018) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.022 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationRivas, J. G., Socarrás, M. E. R., Patruno, G., Uvin, P., Esperto, F., Dinis, P. J., Morgan Rouprêt, A., & Borgmann, H. (2018) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2016.11.010 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationStruck, J. P., Siegel, F. P., Kramer, M. W., Tsaur, I., Heidenreich, A., Haferkamp, A., Merseburger, A. S., Salem, J., & Borgmann, H. (2018) · World Journal of Urology · doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2254-2 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationIncreasing Social Media Use in Urology: 2017 American Urological Association Survey
Loeb, S., Carrick, T., Frey, C., & Titus, T. (2019) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.07.004 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationUnprofessional content on Facebook accounts of US urology residency graduates
Koo, K., Ficko, Z., & Gormley, E. A. (2017) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.13846 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Nastasi, A. J., Bryant, T. S., Canner, J. K., Dredze, M. H., Camp, M. S., & Nagarajan, N. (2017) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-017-1168-9 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Activity, content, contributors, and influencers of the twitter discussion on urologic oncology
Borgmann, H., Loeb, S., Salem, J., Thomas, C., Haferkamp, A., Murphy, D. G., & Tsaur, I. (2016) · Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations · doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.02.021 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluation of Parental Perspectives and Concerns About Pediatric Tonsillectomy in Social Media
Hairston, T. K., Links, A. R., Harris, V. C., Tunkel, D. E., Walsh, J. M., Beach, M. C., & Boss, E. F. (2018) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2917 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Surgical technique for the delayed removal of superglue from the male urethra
Rivas, J. G., Socarrás, M. E. R., & Blanco, L. T. (2016) · Editor-in-Chief s Voice List of Authors is an Important Element in a Scientific Publication · doi:10.5173/ceju.2016.848 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Ciprut, S. E., Curnyn, C., Davuluri, M., Sternberg, K., & Loeb, S. (2017) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.051 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationA Systematic Review of the Use of Social Media for Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines
Bhatt, N. R., Czarniecki, S., Borgmann, H., van Oort, I. M., Esperto, F., Pradère, B., van Gurp, M., Bloemberg, J., Darraugh, J., Morgan Rouprêt, A., et al. (2020) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.008 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationGuideline of guidelines: social media in urology
Taylor, J. I., & Loeb, S. (2019) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.14931 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationThangasamy, I., Loeb, S., Sathianathen, N. J., Leveridge, M., Stork, B., Davies, B., & Woo, H. H. (2019) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.006 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationLoeb, S., Morgan Rouprêt, A., van Oort, I. M., N’Dow, J., van Gurp, M., Bloemberg, J., Darraugh, J., & Ribal, M. J. (2017) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.13802 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolving use of social media among Chinese urologists: Opportunity or challenge?
Long, X., Qi, L., Ou, Z., Zu, X., Cao, Z., Zeng, X., Li, Y., Chen, M., Wang, Z., & Wang, L. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181895 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Integrating Social Media into Urologic Health care: What Can We Learn from Other Disciplines?
Salem, J., Borgmann, H., & Murphy, D. G. (2016) · Current Urology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11934-015-0570-2 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationNew Media for Educating Urology Residents: An Interview Study in Canada and Germany
Salem, J., Borgmann, H., MacNeily, A. E., Böehm, K., Schmid, M., Groeben, C., Baunacke, M., & Huber, J. C. (2016) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.009 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationProstate cancer and social media
Loeb, S., Katz, M. S., Langford, A. T., Byrne, N. K., & Ciprut, S. E. (2018) · Nature Reviews Urology · doi:10.1038/s41585-018-0006-0 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationOnline Discussion on #KidneyStones: A Longitudinal Assessment of Activity, Users and Content
Salem, J., Borgmann, H., Bultitude, M. F., Fritsche, H., Haferkamp, A., Heidenreich, A., Miernik, A. J., Andreas Neisius, F., Knoll, T. M., Thomas, C., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160863 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationSpeaking in Tongues: What Parents Really Think About Tongue-Tie Surgery for Their Infants
Ray, S., Hairston, T. K., Giorgi, M., Links, A. R., Boss, E. F., & Walsh, J. M. (2019) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/0009922819896583 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Correlation between Twitter mentions and academic citations in sexual medicine journals
Özkent, M. S., Böcü, K., Altıntaş, E., & Gül, M. (2021) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/s41443-021-00457-0 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Social media behaviour and patterns of use among nursing students: A systematized review.
Kohanová, D., Sollárová, A., Čakloš, M., Zrubcová, D., & Kolarczyk, E. (2025) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104277 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Understanding the Composition of a Successful Tweet in Urology
Teoh, J. Y., Mackenzie, G., Smith, M. A., Yuen, S. K. K., Gudaru, K., Leow, J. J. J., Leung, S. C. H., Ng, C., & Loeb, S. (2019) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.08.008 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationTop 100 Urology Influencers on Twitter: Is Social Media Influence Associated with Academic Impact?
Corsi, N. J., Nguyen, D., Butaney, M., Majdalany, S. E., Corsi, M. P., Malchow, T., Piontkowski, A. J., Trinh, Q., Loeb, S., & Abdollah, F. (2022) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.009 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationKarlsen, M. C., Lichtenstein, A. H., Economos, C. D., Folta, S. C., Rogers, G. T., Jacques, P. F., Livingston, K. A., Rancaño, K. M., & McKeown, N. M. (2018) · Current Developments in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzy012 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Salem, J., Borgmann, H., Baunacke, M., Böehm, K., Hanske, J., MacNeily, A. E., Meyer, C. P., Nestler, T., Schmid, M., & Huber, J. C. (2017) · Canadian Urological Association Journal · doi:10.5489/cuaj.4267 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationRivas, J. G., Carrión, D. M., Tortolero, L., Veneziano, D., Esperto, F., Greco, F., Cacciamani, G. E., Meneses, A. D., Okhunov, Z., & Socarrás, M. E. R. (2019) · Actas Urológicas Españolas · doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2018.12.003 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Tadros, E., Morgan, A. A., & Durante, K. A. (2022) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x221102847 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Jain, K., Fuoco, M., Fervaha, G., & Leveridge, M. (2018) · Canadian Urological Association Journal · doi:10.5489/cuaj.5042 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The Use of Social Media in Pediatric Urology—Forging New Paths or Crossing Boundaries?
Truong, M., Salib, A., & Rowe, C. K. (2019) · Current Urology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11934-019-0928-y · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Rouse, R., & Regan, J. (2021) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12654 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Rivas, J. G., Socarrás, M. E. R., Tortolero, L., García-Sanz, M., Álvarez‐Maestro, M., Ribal, M. J., & Cózar-Olmo, M. (2016) · Actas Urológicas Españolas · doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2016.09.007 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Following the crowd: patterns of crowdsourcing on Twitter among urologists
Koo, K., Shee, K., & Gormley, E. A. (2018) · World Journal of Urology · doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2405-5 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Social Media in the Urology Practice | Opinion: YES
Bellote, M. C., Trujillo-Santamaría, H., Pelayo-Nieto, M., Prasad, E. H., Gadzhiev, N. K., & Gudaru, K. (2019) · International braz j urol · doi:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.05.03 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Rivas, J. G., Socarrás, M. E. R., Tortolero, L., García-Sanz, M., Alvarez-Maestro, M., Ribal, M. J., & Cózar-Olmo, M. (2017) · Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.acuroe.2017.02.006 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Twitter Use among Academic Urology Programs
Farber, N. J., Koprowski, C. J., Modi, P. K., Wang, W., Dubin, J. M., Kwon, Y. S., & Elsamra, S. E. (2016) · Urology Practice · doi:10.1016/j.urpr.2016.07.009 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Scientific social media, a new way to expand knowledge. What do urologists need to know?
Rivas, J. G., Carrión, D. M., Tortolero, L., Veneziano, D., Esperto, F., Greco, F., Cacciamani, G. E., Meneses, A. D., Okhunov, Z., & Socarrás, M. E. R. (2019) · Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.acuroe.2019.04.005 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Rapid, Efficient Crowdsourcing Using Social Media for the Surgical Management of Nephrolithiasis
Koo, K., Aro, T., & Matlaga, B. R. (2019) · Journal of Endourology · doi:10.1089/end.2019.0481 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Rivas, J. G., Socarrás, M. E. R., Cacciamani, G. E., Meneses, A. D., Okhunov, Z., van Gurp, M., Bloemberg, J., Porgiplia, F., Liatsikos, E., & Veneziano, D. (2019) · Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.acuroe.2019.05.011 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The Hidden Curriculum: Strategies for Preparing Residents for Practice
Balbona, J., & Patel, T. (2020) · Current Urology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11934-020-00992-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Improving the health literacy of persons with epilepsy
Leviton, A., & Loddenkemper, T. (2024) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110237 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Rivas, J. G., Socarrás, M. E. R., Cacciamani, G. E., Meneses, A. D., Okhunov, Z., van Gurp, M., Bloemberg, J., Porgiplia, F., LIATSIKOS, E. N., & Veneziano, D. (2019) · Actas Urológicas Españolas · doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2019.05.007 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Do Articles Shared by Academic Medicine Social Media Influencers Drive Future Citation Rates?
Wang, S. V., Meilchen, C. K., Agrawal, P. M., Rostom, M., Agrawal, G., Able, C. A., Dubin, J. M., Gabrielson, A. T., & Kohn, T. P. (2023) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.009 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Borgmann, H., Katz, M. S., Catto, J. W. F., Weight, C., & Kutikov, A. (2016) · Urology Practice · doi:10.1016/j.urpr.2016.07.011 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation“Evidence-based Tweeting” in Vascular Surgery
Argyriou, C., Lazarides, M. K., & Georgiadis, G. S. (2020) · Annals of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.024 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Loeb, S. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05540-9_16 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationUSO DAS REDES SOCIAIS PELOS PROFISSIONAIS DE SAÚDE E SUAS IMPLICAÇÕES ÉTICAS
Amazonas, J. B., de Souza, N. G., Marinho, R. F., Coêlho, P. D. L. P., dos Santos, M. L. F., dos Santos, E. B., Paiva, S. N. S., & Figueiredo, S. N. (2024) · Revista Contemporânea · doi:10.56083/rcv4n6-198 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
How to Navigate a Scientific Meeting and Make It Worthwhile? A Guide for Young Orthopedic Surgeons
de SA, D. L., Lian, J., Murphy, C. I., Vaswani, R., & Musahl, V. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_53
Chancen und Grenzen eines zeitgemäßen Onlineauftrittes für Urologen
Cebulla, A., Marx, M., & Struck, J. P. (2019) · Aktuelle Urologie · doi:10.1055/a-0903-2299
Loeb, S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20434-1_13
Self-citationMalik, R. D., & Loeb, S. (2022) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2021.08.050
Self-citation(2021) · Der Urologe · doi:10.1007/s00120-021-01452-5
Gopal, D. P., Khan, I., Moschopoulou, E., Donovan, S., Chalder, T., & Taylor, S. J. (2020) · doi:10.2196/preprints.17974
Application of social media in designing and implementing effective healthcare programs
Saluja, P., Grover, V., Arora, S., Batra, K., & Kaur, J. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95630-7.00017-2
Makar, K. G., & Vercler, C. J. (2024) · doi:10.1093/med/9780197655979.003.0014
Lordan, R., Wride, M. A., & O’Sullivan, Í. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.29.620999
- Authors
- Borgmann, H., DeWitt, S., Tsaur, I., Haferkamp, A., & Loeb, S.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Venue
- Canadian Urological Association Journal
- Published
- 2015-10-13
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 713
- ISSN
- 1911-6470 (ISSN-L)
- 1920-1214
- PMC
- PMC4662438
- OpenAlex
- W1946755057
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Canadian Urological Association Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- Twitter, social media in healthcare, urology, professional networking, research dissemination, health care advocacy, clinical practice, clinical decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
