Cited by 29Social Media in Health EducationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital Communication

Evolving use of social media among Chinese urologists: Opportunity or challenge?

Open access
Long, Xingbo, Qi, Lin, Ou, Zhenyu, Zu, Xiongbing, Cao, Zhenzhen, Zeng, Xiting, Li, Yuan, Chen, Minfeng +2 more·2017·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social media has revolutionized the way people communicate, and it has been widely incorporated into medical practice. However, limited data are available regarding the use of social media by Chinese urologists in their practice. METHODS: From 2014 to 2016, during the China Urological Association's (CUA) Annual National Minimally Invasive Urology Academic Conference, an anonymous survey on social media usage was distributed to participant urologists. RESULTS: The results of the survey, which was completed by 665 participants, indicate a conspicuous increase in social media use during the last three years. Regression analysis showed that year (2014 compared to 2016 and 2015), institute location (in the eastern region of China) and age (<35 y) were independent predictors of social media use. Rather than for personal use, an increasing number of respondents said they used social media for professional purposes, and for most respondents, social media has had a positive impact on their practice. However, when posting information on social media, few respondents were aware of the issue of protecting patients' privacy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a dramatic increase in social media use among Chinese urologists, which provides great opportunities for online academic communication and medical education. However, unprofessional use of social media in the medical practice may bring about potential risks and challenges for the further development of social media in medical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0181895

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A linear relationship between increasing age and decreasing social media use was found among physicians of the same specialty or other health care professionals.

    “A linear relationship between increasing age and decreasing SM use was also found among physicians of the same specialty or other HCPs [85,91,94,95,100,106].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Discussion (page not available) reports higher social-media engagement among Chinese urologists under 35 than among older respondents. That supports an age-related difference, but the paper does not establish the claimed linear decline with increasing age or a finding among other health care professionals. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Positive professional behaviors and attitudes regarding patient education and health promotion were reported.

    “Positive professional behaviors and attitudes regarding patient education and health promotion were also reported [34,37,75,97,106].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Results (Professional use of social media; page unavailable) report that 65.4% of respondents thought social media improved the efficiency of patient education, supporting the positive-attitudes part of the claim. The paper also reports some patient-facing use, but only about 30% used social media to communicate with patients; it does not report respondents’ behaviors or attitudes specifically regarding health promotion. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies investigated whether participants mixed professional and personal information and activities on social media sites (blended profiles) or adopted a separation strategy (dual citizenship).

    “Studies also investigated the purpose of SM use, whether participants mixed professional and personal information and activities on SM sites (blended profiles) or adopted a separation strategy where professional information and activities were clearly separated from personal ones (dual citizenship) [34,39,69,78,79,91,96,97,106].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Results section (Fig. 1C; page unavailable in our copy) reports that the survey asked whether respondents used social media professionally, personally, or both. That supports the claim about investigating purpose and mixed use, but the paper does not establish whether respondents kept professional information and activities clearly separate from personal ones—the specific “dual citizenship” strategy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Loosening accountability is a danger to e-professionalism from two points of view: eroding public trust by providing poor quality of information on social media and damaging the professional image.

    “According to some studies in this review, loosening accountability can be seen as a danger to e-professionalism from two points of view: eroding public trust by providing poor quality of information on SM [39,106,117] and damaging to the professional image [43, 45, 51, 56, 57, 59, 64, 66, 68, 70, 73, 102, 106, 112].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Results section (‘Caution advised about unprofessional social media use in the medical practice’; page unavailable) reports that only 6% of respondents checked information for reliability and accuracy before sharing it. The Discussion (page unavailable) calls such social-media use unprofessional, but does not establish that it erodes public trust or damages the professional image. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Loosening accountability is a danger to e-professionalism from two points of view: eroding public trust by providing poor quality information on social media and damage to professional image.

    “According to some studies in this review, loosening accountability can be seen as a danger on e-professionalism from two points of view, eroding public trust by providing poor quality of information on SM [39,106,117] and damage to professional image [43, 45, 51, 56, 57, 59, 64, 66, 68, 70, 73, 102, 106, 112].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Results section, “Caution advised about unprofessional social media use” (page unavailable), reports that only 6% of respondents checked information for reliability and accuracy before sharing it. The Discussion calls such practices unprofessional and warns of potential problems, but it does not establish that they erode public trust or damage professional image. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Vardanian AJ, Kusnezov N, Im DD, Lee JC, Jarrahy R. Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 1184– 93. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318287a072 23629099 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Long, X., Qi, L., Ou, Z., Zu, X., Cao, Z., Zeng, X., Li, Y., Chen, M., Wang, Z., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Long
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2017-07-28
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
e0181895
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2740584416
Cited by
29
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social media use, urologists, Chinese physicians, professional use of social media, patient privacy, medical education, minimally invasive urology, professional conduct of physicians
MeSH terms
Urologists, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Asian People, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review