The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Refining a Competency Model for Instructional Designers in the Context of Online Higher Education
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates the instructional designers (IDs) competencies essential for the context of online higher education, and has selected an instruction design unit in a research university as a case of investigation. To identify and compare IDs competencies at organizational and individual levels, this study employed a mixed method to collect and analyze data based on a validated IDs competency model by the International Board of Standards for Training, Performance and Instruction (ibstpi) as a framework. Throughout the study, IDs’ expected jobs/tasks and currently performed jobs/tasks were systematically analyzed, and the applicability of the ibstpi model in this specific context of online higher education was verified. Based on the empirical findings, this study proposed a refined competency model to improve IDs performance in human resources development and management practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Instructional Designers’ Perceptions of Accessible and Inclusive Online Course Design
Lomellini, A., Lowenthal, P. R., Trespalacios, J., & Snelson, C. (2024) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v28i4.3719 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, J.-Y., & Luo, H.
- Affiliations
- Samsung (South Korea) (KR)
- Central China Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Luo, Heng
- Venue
- International Education Studies
- Published
- 2017-08-27
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 87
- ISSN
- 1913-9020 (ISSN-L)
- 1913-9039
- OpenAlex
- W2748826789
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Education Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, India
- Central China Normal University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Competency Development and Evaluation
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Keywords
- instructional designers, competency model, online higher education, work tasks, human resource development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
