Cited by 45EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

The Effect of Using Automated Essay Evaluation on ESL Undergraduate Students’ Writing Skill

Open access
Aluthman, Ebtisam S.·2016·International Journal of English Linguistics

Abstract

Advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP) have yielded significant advances in the language assessment field. The Automated Essay Evaluation (AEE) mechanism relies on basic research in computational linguistics focusing on transforming human language into algorithmic forms. The Criterion® system is an instance of AEE software providing both formative feedback and an automated holistic score. This paper aims to investigate the impact of this newly-developed AEE software in a current ESL setting by measuring the effectiveness of the Criterion® system in improving ESL undergraduate students’ writing performance. Data was collected from sixty-one ESL undergraduate students in an academic writing course in the English Language department at Princess Norah bint Abdulruhman University PNU. The researcher employed a repeated measure design study to test the potential effects of the formative feedback and automated holistic score on overall writing proficiency across time. Results indicated that the Criterion® system had a positive effect on the students’ cores on their writing tasks. However, results also suggested that students’ mechanics in writing significantly improved, while grammar, usage and style showed only moderate improvement. These findings are discussed in relation to AEE literature. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of implementing AEE software in educational contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5539/ijel.v6n5p54

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aluthman, E. S.
Affiliations
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA)
Corresponding author
Aluthman, Ebtisam S.
Venue
International Journal of English Linguistics
Published
2016-09-23
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
54
ISSN
  • 1923-869X (ISSN-L)
  • 1923-8703
OpenAlex
W2523536876
Cited by
45
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of English Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
automated essay evaluation, academic writing, writing skills, formative feedback, automated grading, writing mechanics, grammar and usage, writing style

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review