Cited by 136Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors

Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Fenofibrate in Patients with High Triglyceride and Low HDL Cholesterol Levels: A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

Open access
Arai, Hidenori, Yamashita, Shizuya, Yokote, Koutaro, Araki, Eiichi, Suganami, Hideki, Ishibashi, Shun, on behalf of the K-877 Study Group·2018·Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis

Abstract

AIM: To verify the superiority of pemafibrate over placebo and the non-inferiority of pemafibrate to the maximum dose of fenofibrate for determining the percent change in fasting serum triglyceride (TG) levels and to investigate safety by assessing the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). METHODS: This phase III, placebo/active drug-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparison study enrolled patients with high TG and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo; pemafibrate 0.1 mg/day, 0.2 mg/day, or 0.4 mg/day; or fenofibrate 100 mg/day or 200 mg/day for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Among 526 randomized patients, 489 completed the study, with drop-out rates of 0%, 6.7%, 5.5%, 5.9%, 8.2%, and 10.7% in the placebo; pemafibrate 0.1 mg/day, 0.2 mg/day, and 0.4 mg/day; and fenofibrate 100 mg/day and 200 mg/day groups. The study showed the non-inferiority of pemafibrate 0.4 mg/day and 0.2 mg/day to fenofibrate 200 mg/day as well the non-inferiority and superiority of all pemafibrate doses to fenofibrate 100 mg/day for reducing TG levels. No dose-dependent increase in the incidence of AEs or ADRs was observed among the pemafibrate dose groups. The incidence of AEs and ADRs for all pemafibrate doses was similar to that for placebo and fenofibrate 100 mg/day and significantly lower than that for fenofibrate 200 mg/day (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The favorable safety profile of pemafibrate, with fewer adverse effects on kidney/liver-related laboratory tests and fewer AEs/ADRs, including those leading to treatment discontinuation, over fenofibrate 200 mg/day may justify the use of this novel and potent treatment option for reducing TG levels in a broader range of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5551/jat.44412

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pemafibrate's triglyceride-lowering effects and safety profile appear generally comparable to existing agents (traditional fibrates).

    “When placed in the context of traditional fibrates, pemafibrate’s triglyceride-lowering effects and safety profile appear generally comparable to existing agents.”

    From Pemafibrate for hypertriglyceridemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and safety outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Discussion reports that pemafibrate 0.2 and 0.4 mg/day were non-inferior to fenofibrate 200 mg/day for lowering triglycerides, supporting a comparison of efficacy. But it reports fewer adverse events and adverse drug reactions than with fenofibrate 200 mg/day, so describing the safety profiles as generally comparable obscures a distinction the study emphasizes. The comparison is also with fenofibrate, not traditional fibrates as a class. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In head-to-head clinical trials, pemafibrate reduced triglyceride levels relative to fenofibrate.

    “In head-to-head clinical trials, pemafibrate was observed to reduce triglyceride levels relative to fenofibrate”

    From Pemafibrate for hypertriglyceridemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and safety outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results > Efficacy passage reports that all tested pemafibrate doses reduced triglycerides more than fenofibrate 100 mg/day. It found pemafibrate 0.2 and 0.4 mg/day non-inferior, but not superior, to fenofibrate 200 mg/day, so the unqualified comparison overstates the result. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In head-to-head clinical trials, pemafibrate showed similar or slightly greater reductions in triglyceride levels compared to fenofibrate in some comparisons.

    “and showed similar or slightly greater reductions in some comparisons”
  • In head-to-head clinical trials, pemafibrate had a generally lower incidence of hepatic and renal adverse events compared to fenofibrate.

    “with a generally lower incidence of hepatic and renal adverse events reported in these studies [23, 24]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Hata Y Goto Y Itakura H: Clinical assessment of GRS-001 (fenofibrate) in hyperlipidemic patients—a double blind, comparative study, using bezafibrate sustainedrelease tablet as a control drug. Geriatr Med, 1995; 33: 765- 822

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arai, H., Yamashita, S., Yokote, K., Araki, E., Suganami, H., Ishibashi, S., & on behalf of the K-877 Study Group
Affiliations
  • National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
  • Rinku General Medical Center (JP)
  • Chiba University (JP)
  • Kumamoto University (JP)
  • Kowa (Japan) (JP)
  • Jichi Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Arai, Hidenori
Venue
Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis
Published
2018-06-01
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
521-538
ISSN
  • 1340-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1880-3873
OpenAlex
W2796005123
Cited by
136
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 7
FWCI
15.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kowa Company
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H04201, 18K08482)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Keywords
pemafibrate, fenofibrate, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol, triglyceride lowering, non-inferiority, adverse drug reactions, drug safety, fibrates, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Hypolipidemic Agents, Benzoxazoles, Butyrates, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Male, Middle Aged, Fenofibrate, Prognosis, Triglycerides, Hypertriglyceridemia, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review