Measuring Non Monetary Innovation In Software: a case study in floss firms from Argentina
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a critical review of the design of innovation surveys that follow the Oslo Manual standards, based on a series of case studies in Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) companies. The main objective of the paper is to contribute to identify the specificities of innovation in FLOSS firms that traditional innovation surveys usually omit, to improve current innovation measures and metrics in the software sector. We applied a qualitative analysis based on seven case studies in FLOSS firms from Argentina, mainly through semi-structured interviews to key informants. Such analysis was aimed to elucidate the nature and particularities of the innovation processes and outcomes in the firms, the characteristics of the collaboration with the community and its role in the business model and innovation strategy of the organizations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is common to find an organizational structure of projects divided into two main groups: core and periphery.
“Es común encontrar una estructura organizativa de los proyectos dividida en dos grupos principales: core y periferia.”
From Desarrollo Floss y gobernanza de pares: el caso del entorno de escritorio Gnome (2020) · cites this paper as Motta et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983 · see citing works
A contribution to the theory of economic growth
Solow, R. M. (1956) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884513 · Cited by 24,483 · see citing works
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,401 · see citing works
Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function
Solow, R. M. (1957) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926047 · Cited by 12,259 · see citing works
(1934) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 7,609 · see citing works
National Systems of Innovation
Lundvall, B., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., Gjerding, A. N., Gelsing, L., Gregersen, B., Christensen, J. L., Freeman, C., Dalum, B., Fagerberg, J., et al. (2010) · Anthem Press eBooks · doi:10.7135/upo9781843318903 · Cited by 6,042 · see citing works
The Oxford Handbook of Innovation
(2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001 · Cited by 5,945 · see citing works
The Economics of Industrial Innovation
Soete, L. L. G., & Freeman, C. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203357637 · Cited by 4,750 · see citing works
Technical Change and Economic Theory.
Swann, G. M. P., & Giovanni Dosi, A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234048 · Cited by 4,061 · see citing works
The cathedral and the bazaar: musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-2841 · Cited by 2,251 · see citing works
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145 · see citing works
Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00030-9 · Cited by 1,790 · see citing works
Lee, G. K., & Cole, R. E. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.633.24866 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Innovation in services: a review of the debate and a research agenda
Gallouj, F., & Savona, M. (2008) · Journal of Evolutionary Economics · doi:10.1007/s00191-008-0126-4 · Cited by 591 · see citing works
Open-Source Software Development and Distributed Innovation
Kogut, B. (2001) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/17.2.248 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms
Dahlander, L., & Magnusson, M. G. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.003 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work
O'Mahony, S. C. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00048-9 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities
West, J., & O'Mahony, S. C. (2008) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662710801970142 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Colombo, M., Piva, E., & Rossi‐Lamastra, C. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.015 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Open Source Software Development: Future or Fad?
Rusovan, S., Lawford, M. S., & Parnas, D. L. (2005) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5326.003.0011 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Capra, E., Francalanci, C., Merlo, F., & Rossi‐Lamastra, C. (2010) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2010.09.004 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Jarmillo, H., Lugones, G., & Villanea, M. S. (2001) · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Handbook of Research on Open Source Software
Amant, K. S., & Still, B. (2007) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-999-1 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., & Rossi‐Lamastra, C. (2012) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.05.004 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Clustering and dependencies in free/open source software development: Methodology and tools
Ghosh, R. A. (2003) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v8i4.1041 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Competencias técnicas de los trabajadores informáticos. El caso de Argentina
Borello, J. A., Erbes, A., Robert, V., Roitter, S. B., & Yoguel, G. (2005) · Revista de la CEPAL · doi:10.18356/55efd82a-es · Cited by 9 · see citing works
El software libre y su difusión en Argentina: mercado, Estado, sociedad
Zanotti, A. (2016) · Poliantea · doi:10.15765/plnt.v11i21.707 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A Study of FOSS'2013 Survey Data Using Clustering TechniquesPreprint
Mani, A., & Mukherjee, R. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.08302 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Borello, J., Robert, V., & Yoguel, G. (Eds.). (2006). La informática en la Argentina : Prometeo-UNGS.
- Crowston, K., Hammouda, I., Lundell, B., Robles, G., Gamalielsson, J. & Lindman, J. (Eds.). (2016). Open Source Systems: Integrating Communities . Proceedings of 12th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2016, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 30 - June 2, 2016.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Sage.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14 (4), 532-550.
- Salazar, M. (2015). Twenty years of innovation measurement in Latin-american countries: lessons learned . Keynote speech presented in the 13th Globelics International Conference, La Havana.
- Von Grogh, G. (2003). Open-source software development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (3), 14-18.
- Von Hippel, E. A. (2005). Democratizing innovation . Cambridge, Mass; London, GB: MIT Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Desarrollo Floss y gobernanza de pares: el caso del entorno de escritorio Gnome
Zanotti, A., & Vélez, J. G. (2020) · International Journal of Innovation · doi:10.5585/iji.v8i3.17114 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“La periferia está compuesta por un gran número (en los proyectos más exitosos) de desarrolladores que prueban el software, informan errores y fallas, proponen parches o mejoras al código (Motta et al., 2019).”
sector software y servicios informáticos (SSI) en pandemia y pospandemia
Rossi, L. S. R. (2023) · Estudios sociales contemporáneos · doi:10.48162/rev.48.070
- Authors
- Motta, J., Morero, H. A., & Borrastero, C.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (AR)
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Venue
- International Journal of Innovation
- Publisher
- University Nove de Julho
- Published
- 2019-01-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-154
- ISSN
- 2318-9975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914717909
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Repositorio Digital de la UNC (National University of Cordoba) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Keywords
- software innovation, free and open source software, innovation survey, Oslo Manual, innovation measurement, innovation indicators, business models, innovation strategy, Argentina
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review