Cited by 2Open Source Software InnovationsInnovation and Knowledge ManagementService and Product Innovation

Measuring Non Monetary Innovation In Software: a case study in floss firms from Argentina

Open access
Motta, Jorge, Morero, Hernán Alejandro, Borrastero, Carina·2019·International Journal of Innovation

Abstract

This paper presents a critical review of the design of innovation surveys that follow the Oslo Manual standards, based on a series of case studies in Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) companies. The main objective of the paper is to contribute to identify the specificities of innovation in FLOSS firms that traditional innovation surveys usually omit, to improve current innovation measures and metrics in the software sector. We applied a qualitative analysis based on seven case studies in FLOSS firms from Argentina, mainly through semi-structured interviews to key informants. Such analysis was aimed to elucidate the nature and particularities of the innovation processes and outcomes in the firms, the characteristics of the collaboration with the community and its role in the business model and innovation strategy of the organizations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5585/iji.v7i1.319

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Borello, J., Robert, V., & Yoguel, G. (Eds.). (2006). La informática en la Argentina : Prometeo-UNGS.
  2. Crowston, K., Hammouda, I., Lundell, B., Robles, G., Gamalielsson, J. & Lindman, J. (Eds.). (2016). Open Source Systems: Integrating Communities . Proceedings of 12th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2016, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 30 - June 2, 2016.
  3. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Sage.
  4. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14 (4), 532-550.
  5. Salazar, M. (2015). Twenty years of innovation measurement in Latin-american countries: lessons learned . Keynote speech presented in the 13th Globelics International Conference, La Havana.
  6. Von Grogh, G. (2003). Open-source software development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (3), 14-18.
  7. Von Hippel, E. A. (2005). Democratizing innovation . Cambridge, Mass; London, GB: MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motta, J., Morero, H. A., & Borrastero, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (AR)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Venue
International Journal of Innovation
Published
2019-01-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
135-154
ISSN
2318-9975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914717909
Cited by
2
References
29
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repositorio Digital de la UNC (National University of Cordoba) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
software innovation, free and open source software, innovation survey, Oslo Manual, innovation measurement, innovation indicators, business models, innovation strategy, Argentina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review