The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants of Slovakia
Open accessAbstract
This paper is an ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants gathered for consumption from the 19th century to the present day, within the present borders of Slovakia. Twenty-four sources (mainly ethnographic) documenting the culinary use of wild plants were analysed. The use of 106 species (over 3% of the Slovak flora) has been recorded. Nowadays most of them are no longer used, or used rarely, apart from a few species of wild fruits. The most frequently used plants include the fruits of Rubus idaeus, Fragaria spp., Rubus subgenus Rubus, Vaccinium myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, Fagus sylvatica, Corylus avellana, Prunus spinosa, Pyrus spp., Malus spp., Crataegus spp. and the leaves of Urtica dioica, Rumex acetosa, Chenopodiaceae species, Cardamine amara, Glechoma spp., Taraxacum spp. and Oxalis acetosella. The most commonly used wild food taxa are nearly identical to those used in Poland, and the same negative association of wild vegetables with famine exists in Slovakia, resulting in their near complete disappearance from the present-day diet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant identification credibility in ethnobotany: A closer look at Polish ethnographic studies
Łuczaj, Ł. J. (2010) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/1746-4269-6-36 · Cited by 116 · cited 3×
“As shown by Łuczaj [61], ruling out identification mistakes is not possible without voucher specimens.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Łuczaj, Ł., Pieroni, A., Tardío, J., Pardo-de-Santayana, M., Sõukand, R., Svanberg, I., & Kalle, R. (2012) · Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae · doi:10.5586/asbp.2012.031 · Cited by 673
Self-citationAn ethnobotanical perspective on traditional fermented plant foods and beverages in Eastern Europe
Sõukand, R., Pieroni, A., Biró, M., Dénes, A., Dogan, Y., Hajdari, A., Kalle, R., Reade, B., Mustafa, B., Nedelcheva, A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2015.05.018 · Cited by 409
Self-citationA hundred years of change in wild vegetable use in southern Herzegovina
Łuczaj, Ł., & Dolina, K. (2015) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2015.02.033 · Cited by 311
Self-citationEthnobotanical review of wild edible plants used in the Czech Republic
Simkova, K., & Polesný, Z. (2014) · Angewandte Botanik · doi:10.5073/jabfq.2015.088.009 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Łuczaj, Ł.
- Venue
- Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
- Publisher
- Polish Botanical Society
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 245-255
- ISSN
- 0001-6977 (ISSN-L)
- 2083-9480
- OpenAlex
- W2144268165
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
