Cited by 15Drug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPharmaceutical studies and practices

Simulated rat intestinal fluid improves oral exposure prediction for poorly soluble compounds over a wide dose range

Open access
Berghausen, Joerg, Seiler, Frank Hans, Gobeau, Nathalie, Faller, Bernard·2016·ADMET & DMPK

Abstract

Solubility can be the absorption limiting factor for drug candidates and is therefore a very important input parameter for oral exposure prediction of compounds with limited solubility. Biorelevant media of the fasted and fed state have been published for humans, as well as for dogs in the fasted state. In a drug discovery environment, rodents are the most common animal model to assess the oral exposure of drug candidates. In this study a rat simulated intestinal fluid (rSIF) is proposed as a more physiologically relevant media to describe drug solubility in rats. Equilibrium solubility in this medium was tested as input parameter for physiologically-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) simulations of oral pharmacokinetics in the rat. Simulations were compared to those obtained using other solubility values as input parameters, like buffer at pH 6.8, human simulated intestinal fluid and a comprehensive dissolution assay based on rSIF. Our study on nine different compounds demonstrates that the incorporation of rSIF equilibrium solubility values into PBPK models of oral drug exposure can significantly improve the reliability of simulations in rats for doses up to 300 mg/kg compared to other media. The comprehensive dissolution assay may help to improve further simulation outcome, but the greater experimental effort as compared to equilibrium solubility may limit its use in a drug discovery environment. Overall, PBPK simulations based on solubility in the proposed rSIF medium can improve prioritizing compounds in drug discovery as well as planning dose escalation studies, e.g. during toxicological investigations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5599/admet.4.1.258

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rat simulated intestinal fluid (rSIF) was prepared according to Berghausen et al. who concluded that the incorporation of rSIF equilibrium solubility values into in silico models of oral drug exposure can significantly improve the accuracy of simulations in rats for doses up to 300 mg/kg compared to other media.

    “Rat simulated intestinal fluid (rSIF) was prepared according to Berghausen et al. who investigating nine compounds with different physico-chemical properties and concluded that the incorporation of rSIF equilibrium solubility values into in silico models of oral drug exposure can significantly improve the accuracy of simulations in rats for doses up to 300 mg/kg compared to other media (Berghausen”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. E.S. Kostewicz, L. Aarons, M. Bergstrand, M.B. Bolger, A. Galetin, O. Hatley, M. Jamei, R. Lloyd, X. Pepin, A. Rostami-Hodjegan, E. Sjögren, C. Tannergren, D.B. Turner, C. Wagner, W. Weitschies, J. Dressman, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 57 (2014) 300-321.
  2. E.L. McConnel, A.W Basit, S. Murdan, The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 60(1) (2008) 63- 70.
  3. R. Holm, A. Mullertz, H. Mu, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 453(1) (2013) 44-55.
  4. M. Hagio, M. Matsumoto, M. Fukushima, H. Hara, S. Ishizuka, Journal of Lipid Research 50(1) (2009) 173-180.
  5. J. M. Dietschy, Journal of Lipid Research 9(3) (1968) 297-309.
  6. Y. Tanaka, T. Hara, W. Ryoichi, N. Shunji, Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences 15(4) (2012), 510-518.
  7. H. Musther, A. Olivares-Morales, O.J. Hatley, B. Liu, A. Rostami Hodjegan, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 57 (2014) 280-291.
  8. M. Arndt, H. Chokshi, K. Tang, N.J. Parrott, C. Reppas, J.B. Dressman, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 84(3) (2013) 633-641.
  9. N. Parrott, N. Paquereau, P. Coassolo, T. Lave, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 94(10) (2005) 2327-2343.
  10. F. Wohnsland, B. Faller, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 44(6) (2001) 923-930.
  11. K. Magwedere, S. Mukaratirwa, International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine 6(3) (2008) 166-174.
  12. H.A. Merchant, S.C. Rabbie, F.J.O. Varum, F. Afonso-Pereira, A.W. Basit, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 62 (2014) 76-85.
  13. M. Germani, P. Crivori, M. Rocchetti, P.S. Burton, A.G. Wilson, M.E. Smith, I. Pogessi, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 31 (2007) 190-201.
  14. H. M. Jones, I. B. Gardner, K. J. Watson, The AAPS Journal 11(1) (2009) 155-166.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berghausen, J., Seiler, F. H., Gobeau, N., & Faller, B.
Affiliations
Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Venue
ADMET & DMPK
Published
2016-03-30
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
35
ISSN
1848-7718 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2316567121
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • ADMET & DMPK (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
equilibrium solubility, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, oral pharmacokinetics, biorelevant media, dose escalation, drug discovery, toxicology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review