Evaluation of the GastroPlus™ Advanced Compartmental and Transit (ACAT) Model in Early Discovery
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the oral exposure predictions obtained early in drug discovery with a generic GastroPlus Advanced Compartmental And Transit (ACAT) model based on the in vivo intravenous blood concentration-time profile, in silico properties (lipophilicity, pKa) and in vitro high-throughput absorption-distribution-metabolism-excretion (ADME) data (as determined by PAMPA, solubility, liver microsomal stability assays).Methods The model was applied to a total of 623 discovery molecules and their oral exposure was predicted in rats and/or dogs. The predictions of Cmax, AUClast and Tmax were compared against the observations.Results The generic model proved to make predictions of oral Cmax, AUClast and Tmax within 3-fold of the observations for rats in respectively 65%, 68% and 57% of the 537 cases. For dogs, it was respectively 77%, 79% and 85% of the 124 cases. Statistically, the model was most successful at predicting oral exposure of Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) class 1 compounds compared to classes 2 and 3, and was worst at predicting class 4 compounds oral exposure.Conclusion The generic GastroPlus ACAT model provided reasonable predictions especially for BCS class 1 compounds. For compounds of other classes, the model may be refined by obtaining more information on solubility and permeability in secondary assays. This increases confidence that such a model can be used in discovery projects to understand the parameters limiting absorption and extrapolate predictions across species. Also, when predictions disagree with the observations, the model can be updated to test hypotheses and understand oral absorption.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If BCS class is predicted as I and II, mechanistic oral absorption modelling predictions may be straightforward, while class III and IV compounds may be more challenging.
“Thus, if the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) [27] class is predicted as I and II, mechanistic oral absorption modelling predictions may be straightforward, while class III and IV compounds may be more challenging [19, 28, 29].”
Cites
Amidon, G. L., Lennernäs, H., Shah, V. P., & Crison, J. R. (1995) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1016212804288 · Cited by 5,430 · see citing works
Physiological Parameters in Laboratory Animals and Humans
Davies, B., & Morris, T. (1993) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1018943613122 · Cited by 2,930 · see citing works
Rodgers, T., & Rowland, M. (2006) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20502 · Cited by 949 · see citing works
Rodgers, T., Leahy, D., & Rowland, M. (2005) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20322 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Dissolution Media Simulating Conditions in the Proximal Human Gastrointestinal Tract: An Update
Jantratid, E., Janssen, N., Reppas, C., & Dressman, J. B. (2008) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-008-9569-4 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Predicting the Impact of Physiological and Biochemical Processes on Oral Drug Bioavailability
Agoram, B., Woltosz, W. S., & Bolger, M. B. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00179-x · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Wohnsland, F., & Faller, B. (2001) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm001020e · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Self-citationJones, H., Chen, Y., Gibson, C., Heimbach, T., Parrott, N., Peters, S., Snoeys, J., Upreti, V., Zheng, M., & Hall, S. (2015) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.37 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
PBPK models for the prediction of in vivo performance of oral dosage forms
Kostewicz, E. S., Aarons, L. J., Bergstrand, M., Bolger, M. B., Galetin, A., Hatley, O. J. D., Jamei, M., Lloyd, R. S., Pepin, X. J. H., Rostami‐Hodjegan, A., et al. (2013) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2013.09.008 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Estimation of the increase in solubility of drugs as a function of bile salt concentration
Mithani, S. D., Bakatselou, V., TenHoor, C. N., & Dressman, J. B. (1996) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1016062224568 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Membrane Transport of Drugs in Different Regions of the Intestinal Tract of the Rat
Ungell, A. ‐., Nylander, S., Bergstrand, S., et al. (1998) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1021/js970218s · Cited by 258 · see citing works
De Buck, S. S., Sinha, V. K., Fenu, L. A., Nijsen, M. J., Mackie, C. E., & Gilissen, R. A. H. J. (2007) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.107.015644 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Self-citationIto, K., & Houston, J. B. (2004) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/b:pham.0000026429.12114.7d · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Modelling and PBPK Simulation in Drug Discovery
Jones, H., Gardner, I., & Watson, K. J. (2009) · AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-009-9088-1 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Animal versus human oral drug bioavailability: Do they correlate?
Musther, H., Olivares-Morales, A., Hatley, O. J. D., Liu, B., & Rostami Hodjegan, A. (2014) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2013.08.018 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Poulin, P., Jones, R. D. O., Jones, H. M., Gibson, C. R., Rowland, M., Chien, J. Y., Ring, B. J., Adkison, K. K., Ku, M. S., He, H., et al. (2011) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.22550 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Sjögren, E., Westergren, J., Grant, I., Hanisch, G., Lindfors, L., Lennernäs, H., Abrahamsson, B., & Tannergren, C. (2013) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2013.05.019 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Dissolution Modeling: Factors Affecting the Dissolution Rates of Polydisperse Powders
Lu, A. T. K., Frisella, M. E., & Johnson, K. C. (1993) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1018917729477 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Evaluation of a Generic Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Lineshape Analysis
Peters, S. A. (2008) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200847040-00004 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Applications of Physiologically Based Absorption Models in Drug Discovery and Development
Parrott, N. J., & Lavé, T. (2008) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp8000155 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Parrott, N., Paquereau, N., Coassolo, P., & Lavé, T. (2005) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20419 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Wajima, T., Yano, Y., Fukumura, K., & Oguma, T. (2004) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20099 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Di, L., Feng, B., Goosen, T. C., Lai, Y., Steyn, S. J., Varma, M. V. S., & Obach, R. S. (2013) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.113.054031 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Buck, S. S. D., Sinha, V. K., Fenu, L. A., Gilissen, R., Mackie, C. E., & Nijsen, M. (2007) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.106.014027 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Heikkinen, A. T., Baneyx, G., Caruso, A., & Parrott, N. (2012) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2012.06.013 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Gao, Y., Carr, R. A., Spence, J. K., Wang, W. W., Turner, T. M., Lipari, J. M., & Miller, J. M. (2010) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp100157s · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Poulin, P., & Haddad, S. (2012) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.23090 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
The right compound in the right assay at the right time: an integrated discovery DMPK strategy
Ballard, P. G., Brassil, P. J., Bui, K., Dolgos, H., Petersson, C., Tunek, A., & Webborn, P. J. H. (2012) · Drug Metabolism Reviews · doi:10.3109/03602532.2012.691099 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Vuppugalla, R., Marathe, P., He, H., Jones, R. D. O., Yates, J. W. T., Jones, H. M., Gibson, C. R., Chien, J. Y., Ring, B. J., Adkison, K. K., et al. (2011) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.22551 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
A Modified Physiological BCS for Prediction of Intestinal Absorption in Drug Discovery
Zaki, N. M., Artursson, P., & Bergström, C. A. S. (2010) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp100124f · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Evolution of the physicochemical properties of marketed drugs: can history foretell the future?
Faller, B., Ottaviani, G., Ertl, P., Berellini, G., & Collis, A. J. (2011) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2011.07.003 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationHeikkinen, A. T., Fowler, S., Gray, L., Li, J., Peng, Y., Yadava, P., Railkar, A., & Parrott, N. (2013) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp300692k · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Tanaka, Y., Baba, T., Tagawa, K., et al. (2014) · Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.18433/j37606 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Benefit of Retraining pKa Models Studied Using Internally Measured Data
Gedeck, P., Lu, Y., Skolnik, S. M., et al. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00172 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Tanaka, Y., Waki, R., & Nagata, S. (2013) · Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2133/dmpk.dmpk-13-rg-022 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Berghausen, J., Seiler, F. H., Gobeau, N., & Faller, B. (2016) · ADMET & DMPK · doi:10.5599/admet.4.1.258 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Miller, N. A., Reddy, M. B., Heikkinen, A. T., Lukacova, V., & Parrott, N. (2019) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1007/s40262-019-00741-9 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
“Thus, if the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) [27] class is predicted as I and II, mechanistic oral absorption modelling predictions may be straightforward, while class III and IV compounds may be more challenging [19, 28, 29].”
Background
- Authors
- Gobeau, N., Stringer, R., De Buck, S., Tuntland, T., & Faller, B.
- Affiliations
- Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gobeau, N.
- Venue
- Pharmaceutical Research
- Published
- 2016-06-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2126-2139
- ISSN
- 0724-8741 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-904X
- OpenAlex
- W2417297292
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmaceutical Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The Novartis Repository (Novartis) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Novartis Pharma
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Keywords
- early drug discovery, Biopharmaceutics Classification System, Pampas, solubility, permeability, interspecies extrapolation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Computer Simulation, Dogs, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Male, Models, Biological, Permeability, Solubility, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Drug Discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review