Cited by 4Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Effects of fibrates on lipid profile: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Olmastroni, Elena, Galimberti, Federica, Xie, Sining, Casula, Manuela, Catapano, Alberico L·2025·European Atherosclerosis Journal

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the lipid-lowering effects of fibratesLiterature was searched up to December 2024. Absolute changes in triglycerides (TG), LDL-cholesterol (LDL‑C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) were analyzed using both fixed and random effects models. We included 63 randomized controlled trials. Compared to placebo, all fibrates significantly reduced TG levels. Fenofibrate and bezafibrate significantly reduced LDL-C (–15.12 and –15.04 mg/dL, respectively), while only fenofibrate significantly lowered ApoB (–24.88 mg/dL) and non-HDL-C (–46.38 mg/dL), followed by gemfibrozil and pemafibrate for non-HDL-C. In combination with statins, no fibrates significantly reduced LDL-C, while fenofibrate remained the only fibrate to significantly lower ApoB (–10.42 mg/dL) and non-HDL-C (–12.02 mg/dL). Overall, we found that fibrates differ substantially in their lipid effects. Fenofibrate shows the most consistent and comprehensive lipid-lowering profile.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.56095/eaj.v4i1.103

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pemafibrate's triglyceride-lowering effects and safety profile appear generally comparable to existing agents (traditional fibrates).

    “When placed in the context of traditional fibrates, pemafibrate’s triglyceride-lowering effects and safety profile appear generally comparable to existing agents.”

    From Pemafibrate for hypertriglyceridemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and safety outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Abstract (page not provided) reports that all fibrates significantly reduced triglycerides compared with placebo, supporting the triglyceride-lowering part of the claim. It does not establish that pemafibrate’s effect is comparable in magnitude to traditional fibrates, and the available text does not compare their safety profiles. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Meta-analytic evidence suggests that pemafibrate's lipid-modifying effects, including reductions in triglycerides and modest improvements in HDL-C, are broadly comparable to those seen with conventional fibrates.

    “Meta-analytic evidence also suggests that pemafibrate’s lipid-modifying effects, including reductions in triglycerides and modest improvements in HDL-C, are broadly comparable to those seen with conventional fibrates, although the certainty of evidence varies and long-term clinical implications remain uncertain [25, 26].”

    From Pemafibrate for hypertriglyceridemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and safety outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that all fibrates, including pemafibrate, significantly reduced triglycerides compared with placebo. It does not report HDL-C effects or establish that pemafibrate is broadly comparable to conventional fibrates; instead, it says fibrates differ substantially in their lipid effects. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olmastroni, E., Galimberti, F., Xie, S., Casula, M., & Catapano, A. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • MultiMedica (IT)
Venue
European Atherosclerosis Journal
Published
2025-04-30
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
2785-7115 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411417662
Cited by
4
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
European Atherosclerosis Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Ministero della Salute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
fibrates, hypolipidemic effect, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, gemfibrozil, pemafibrate, hypertriglyceridemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review