The Iron Age chronology debate: Is the gap narrowing? Another viewpoint
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The gap between the two camps in the Iron Age chronology debate has now narrowed to a few decades, ca. 970-940 BCE.
“Note that the gap between the two camps has now narrowed to a few decades, ca. 970-940 BCE (Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2011; Mazar 2011).”
From Absolute Chronology of Megiddo, Israel, in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages: High-Resolution Radiocarbon Dating (2014) · cites this paper as Mazar 2011
Cites
Gilboa, A., & Sharon, I. (2003) · Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research · doi:10.2307/1357808 · Cited by 141 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several studies by Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2006), as well as the results of the Tel Rehov excavations, have shown that the Iron IIA can be divided into an early and a late phase.”
Sub-dividing the Iron Age IIA in northern Israel: a suggested solution to the chronological debate
Herzog, Z., & Singer-Avitz, L. (2006) · Tel Aviv · doi:10.1179/tav.2006.2006.2.163 · Cited by 85 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several studies by Herzog and Singer-Avitz (2006), as well as the results of the Tel Rehov excavations, have shown that the Iron IIA can be divided into an early and a late phase.”
<sup>14</sup>C Dates and the Iron Age Chronology of Israel: A Response
Mazar, A., & Bronk Ramsey, C. (2008) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200033506 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toffolo, M. B., Arie, E., Martin, M. A. S., Boaretto, E., & Finkelstein, I. (2014) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.2458/56.16899 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Manning, S. W., Griggs, C., Lorentzen, B., Bronk Ramsey, C., Chivall, D., Jull, A. J. T., & Lange, T. E. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1719420115 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Webster, L. C., Wolff, S. R., Ortiz, S. M., Barbosa, M., Coyle, C., Arbino, G. P., Dee, M. W., Hua, Q., & Jacobsen, G. E. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293119 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Kleiman, S., Kleiman, A., & Ben-Yosef, E. (2017) · Tel Aviv · doi:10.1080/03344355.2017.1357313 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The Beth Shean Valley and its Vicinity in the 10th Century BCE
Mazar, A. (2021) · Jerusalem Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.52486/01.00001.10 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Mazar, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Mazar, Amihai
- ORCID
- Mazar, Amihai
- Venue
- Near Eastern Archaeology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-111
- ISSN
- 1094-2076 (ISSN-L)
- 2325-5404
- OpenAlex
- W2480836802
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 48.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Near Eastern Archaeology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- Iron Age chronology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
