Cited by 61Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Diagnostic Accuracy of Split-Night Polysomnograms

Open access
Khawaja, Imran S., Olson, Eric J., van der Walt, Christelle, Bukartyk, Jan, Somers, Virend, Dierkhising, Ross, Morgenthaler, Timothy I.·2010·Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Study objectives American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) practice parameters indicate that split-night polysomnograms (SN-PSG) may be performed when the apnea hypopnea index (AHI) is > or = 20 to 40, depending on clinical factors. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of SN-PSG, including at the lower range of AHIs. Methods We reviewed 114 consecutive full-night PSGs (FN-PSG) performed at our center between August 2006 and November 2008 on subjects enrolled in studies in which obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was the sleep disorder of interest. We compared the AHI from the first 2 hours (2 hr-AHI) and 3 hours (3 hr-AHI) of sleep with the "gold standard" AHI from FN-PSG (FN-AHI), considering OSA present if FN-AHI > or = 5. Results The 2 hr-AHI and 3 hr-AHI correlated strongly with the FN-AHI (concordance correlation coefficient [CCC] = 0.93 and 0.97, respectively). After adjusting for percentage of sleep in stage REM sleep and in supine position, the correlation of 2 hr- and 3 hr-AHI with FN-AHI remained strong (0.92 and 0.96, respectively). The area under the receiver operating curves (AUC) for 2 hr-AHI and 3 hr-AHI using FN-AHI > or = 5 were 0.93 and 0.95, respectively. Conclusions The AHI derived from the first 2 or 3 hours of sleep is of sufficient diagnostic accuracy to rule-in OSA at an AHI threshold of 5 in patients suspected of having OSA. This study suggests that the current recommended threshold for split-night studies (AHI > or = 20 to 40) may be revised to a lower number, allowing for more efficient use of resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5664/jcsm.27877

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three studies focused on the diagnostic accuracy of the initial portion of the PSG recording, against the accuracy of using the same full-night recording, and a fourth study compared the accuracy of the diagnostic portion of a split-night study against a separate full-night study.

    “Three focused on the diagnostic accuracy of the initial portion of the PSG recording, against the accuracy of using the same full-night recording,121,122,127 and a fourth study compared the accuracy of the diagnostic portion of a split-night study against a separate full-night study.123”

    From Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Testing for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline (2017) · cites this paper as [121]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When comparing 3 hours of recording versus the full-night recording, excellent consistency of the AHI was observed; there was no significant difference in the AHI derived from the first 3 hours of total sleep time versus the total sleep time (concordance correlation coefficient adjusted for REM and supine sleep of 0.96 and an accuracy of 93%).

    “When comparing 3 hours of recording versus the full-night recording, excellent consistency of the AHI was observed; there was no significant difference in the AHI derived from the first 3 hours of total sleep time versus the total sleep time (concordance correlation coefficient adjusted for REM and supine sleep of 0.96 and an accuracy of 93%),121”

    From Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Testing for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline (2017) · cites this paper as [121]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The available studies were methodologically limited due to use of suboptimal study designs (not RCTs), use of the initial portion of a full-night PSG recording as a surrogate for the baseline portion of a split-night study, and a lack of consistent use of standard monitoring (e.g., nasal pressure transducer).

    “The available studies were methodologically limited due to a number of issues: use of suboptimal study designs (not RCTs), use of the initial portion of a full-night PSG recording as a surrogate for the baseline portion of a split-night study,121,127 and a lack of consistent use of standard monitoring (e.g., nasal pressure transducer).121”
  • That study reported a sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.91) and specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92 to 1.00) using a cutoff of AHI ≥ 15.

    “This study reported a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.90) and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83 to 0.98) using a cutoff of AHI ≥ 5, and a sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.91) and specificity of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92 to 1.00) using a cutoff of AHI ≥ 15”
  • One study found that the 2-hour AHI and 3-hour AHI strongly correlated with the full-night AHI (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.93 and 0.97, respectively).

    “One study found that the 2-hour AHI and 3-hour AHI strongly correlated with the full-night AHI (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.93 and 0.97, respectively).121”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1217–39. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2109080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]White D. Sleep apnea. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3:124–8. doi: 10.1513/pats.200510-116JH. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. [3]Namen AM, Dunagan DP, Fleischer A, et al. Increased physician-reported sleep apnea. Chest. 2002;121:1741–7. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.6.1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [4]Patel N, Ahmed M, Rosen I. Split-night polysomnography. Chest. 2007;132:1664–71. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Deutsch PA, Simmons MS, Wallace JM. Cost-effectiveness of split-night polysomnography and home studies in the evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2006;2:145–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Kushida CA, Chediak A, Berry RB, et al. Clinical guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008;4:157–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures. Polysomnography Task Force, American Sleep Disorders Association Standards of Practice Committee. Sleep. 1997;20:406–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1230–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304293281704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  9. [9]Charbonneau M, Marin JM, Olha A, Kimoff RJ, Levy RD, Cosio MG. Changes in obstructive sleep apnea characteristics through the night. Chest. 1994;106:1695–701. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.6.1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [10]Sanders MH, Black J, Costantino JP, Kern N, Studnicki K, Coates J. Diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing by half-night polysomnography. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144:1256–61. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.6.1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [11]Scharf SM, Garshick E, Brown R, Tishler PV, Tosteson T, McCarley R. Screening for subclinical sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep. 1990;13:344–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. [12]Iber C, O'Brien C, Schluter J, Davies S, Leatherman J, Mahowald M. Single night studies in obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 1991;14:383–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [13]Yamashiro Y, Kryger MH. CPAP titration for sleep apnea using a split-night protocol. Chest. 1995;107:62–6. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  14. [14]Kushida CA, Littner MR, Morgenthaler T, et al. Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures: an update for 2005. Sleep. 2005;28:499–521. doi: 10.1093/sleep/28.4.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  15. [15]Chervin RD, Moyer CA, Palmisano J, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing in Michigan: a practice pattern survey. Sleep Breath. 2003;7:95–104. doi: 10.1007/s11325-003-0095-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [16]Kushida CA, Littner MR, Hirshkowitz M, et al. Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders. Sleep. 2006;29:375–80. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.3.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [17]Iber C, Ancoli-Israel S, Chesson A, Quan SF. The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology and technical specifications. Westchester, Illinois: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  18. [19]Redline S, Adams N, Strauss ME, Roebuck T, Winters M, Rosenberg C. Improvement of mild sleep-disordered breathing with CPAP compared with conservative therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:858–65. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.3.9709042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  19. [20]Lin L, Torbeck LD. Coefficient of accuracy and concordance correlation coefficient: new statistics for methods comparison. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 1998;52:55–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [21]Carrasco J, Jover L. Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components. Biometrics. 2003;59:849–58. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2003.00099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [22]Noether G. Two confidence intervals for the ratio of two probabilities and some measures of effectiveness. J Am Stat Assoc. 1957;52:35–45. [Google Scholar]
  22. [23]Bowling A, Ebrahim S. Handbook of health research methods: investigation, measurement and analysis. Maidenhead, England, New York, NY: Open University Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  23. [24]Reiman MP, Manske RC. Functional testing in human performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  24. [25]Elshaug AG, Moss JR, Southcott AM. Implementation of a split-night protocol to improve efficiency in assessment and treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Intern Med J. 2005;35:251–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00786.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  25. [26]Minai OA, Paracha MI, Golish JA, et al. Adequacy of CPAP titration during split-night polysomnogram (PSG) Chest. 1998;114:379S. [Google Scholar]
  26. [27]Sanders MH, Costantino JP, Strollo PJ, Jr, Studnicki K, Atwood CW., Jr The impact of split-night polysomnography for diagnosis and positive pressure therapy titration on treatment acceptance and adherence in sleep apnea/hypopnea. Sleep. 2000;23:17–24. doi: 10.1093/sleep/23.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [28]Yamashiro Y, Suganuma Y, Miyasaka T, Hosaka K, Uchida K. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) treatment using a split-night protocol for sleep breathing disorder. Kokyu To Junkan. 1997;45:1011–4. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khawaja, I. S., Olson, E. J., van der Walt, C., Bukartyk, J., Somers, V., Dierkhising, R., & Morgenthaler, T. I.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Morgenthaler, Timothy I.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Published
2010-08-15
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
357-362
ISSN
  • 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9397
OpenAlex
W41820605
Cited by
61
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
split-night polysomnography, obstructive sleep apnea, apnea-hypopnea index, diagnostic accuracy, REM sleep, supine position, sleep stage classification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Standards, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Sleep, Time Factors, Comorbidity, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review