Cited by 473Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

A new single-item sleep quality scale: results of psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic primary insomnia and depression

Open access
Snyder, Ellen, Cai, Bing, DeMuro, Carla, Morrison, Mary F., Ball, William·2018·Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Study objectives A single-item sleep quality scale (SQS) was developed as a simple and practical sleep quality assessment and psychometrically evaluated.Methods SQS measurement characteristics were evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and morning questionnaire-insomnia (MQI) according to prespecified analysis plans in separate clinical studies of patients with insomnia and depression. Patients with insomnia (n = 70) received 4 weeks' usual care with an FDA-approved hypnotic agent; patients with depression (n = 651) received 8 weeks' active or experimental therapy.Results Concurrent criterion validity (correlation with measures of a similar construct) was demonstrated by strong (inverse) correlations between the SQS and MQI (week 1 Pearson correlation -.76) and PSQI (week 8 Goodman-Kruskal correlation -.92) sleep quality items in populations with insomnia and depression, respectively. In patients with depression, stronger correlations between the SQS and PSQI core sleep quality components versus other items supported convergent/divergent construct validity (similarity/dissimilarity to related/unrelated measures). Known-groups validity was evidenced by decreasing mean SQS scores across those who sleep normally, those borderline to having sleep problems, and those with problems sleeping. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) was .62 during a 4-week period of sleep stability in patients with insomnia and .74 in stable patients with depression (1 week). Effect sizes (standardized response means) for change from baseline were 1.32 (week 1) and .67 (week 8) in populations with insomnia and depression, respectively. Mean SQS changes from baseline to week 8 convergently decreased across groups of patients with depression categorized by level of PSQI sleep quality improvement.Conclusions The SQS possesses favorable measurement characteristics relative to lengthier or more frequently administered sleep questionnaires in patients with insomnia and depression.Clinical trial registration Registry: ClincalTrials.gov, Title: Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder With MK0869, Identifier: NCT00034983, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00034983.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5664/jcsm.7478

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SQS has excellent concurrent and convergent validity with other lengthier sleep scales and is effective in determining clinically meaningful changes in sleep quality.

    “The SQS has been shown to have excellent concurrent and convergent validity with other lengthier sleep scales and has been demonstrated to be effective in determining clinically meaningful changes in sleep quality (Snyder et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Argesti A. Analysis of Ordinal and Categorical Data. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snyder, E., Cai, B., DeMuro, C., Morrison, M. F., & Ball, W.
Affiliations
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Snyder, Ellen
Venue
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Published
2018-11-15
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
1849-1857
ISSN
  • 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9397
OpenAlex
W2900723373
Cited by
473
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4
FWCI
18.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
sleep quality assessment, chronic primary insomnia, depression, psychometric validation, criterion validity, construct validity, known-groups validity, test-retest reliability, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, hypnotics, major depressive disorder
MeSH terms
Aprepitant, Adult, Aged, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Paroxetine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review